Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!

2012-05-02 Thread Robert Millan
2012/5/1 Aurelien Jarno : >> Are you sure this is correct?  It seems to me that this can be a big >> problem if those packages migrate to testing before eglibc does. >> > > Not it's a mistake, I don't know how I managed that. I am going to fix > that in an upload today. Thanks! -- Robert Millan

Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!

2012-05-02 Thread Robert Millan
2012/5/3 Robert Millan : >> Not it's a mistake, I don't know how I managed that. I am going to fix >> that in an upload today. > > Thanks! Christoph, I made a list of packages that might improve somewhat if they're rebuilt with libc0.1-dev >= 2.13-32. Please consider scheduling rebuilds for: aut

Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!

2012-05-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:24:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2012/4/22 Robert Millan : > > I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency > > part.  I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new > > packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on

Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!

2012-04-29 Thread Robert Millan
2012/4/22 Robert Millan : > I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency > part.  I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new > packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 >= > 2.13-31. > > VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE: if this patch

Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!

2012-04-22 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 03:11:35PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency > part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new > packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 >= > 2.13-31.

Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!

2012-04-22 Thread Robert Millan
El 22 d’abril de 2012 17:08, Aurelien Jarno ha escrit: > I have been mostly away from Debian stuff in the last weeks due to > moving, but i'll try to catchup with glibc stuff during the next days > and schedule an upload for the middle of the week. Good to hear, thanks. -- Robert Millan -- To

new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!

2012-04-22 Thread Robert Millan
Hi, I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 >= 2.13-31. VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE: if this patch is introduced in a later version