Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041056: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #932523,
regarding kfreebsd-10: Don't build against flex-old
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041056: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #978513,
regarding kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-9)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041056: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #827070,
regarding kfreebsd-10: please use LDADD instead of LDFLAGS for aicasm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041056: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #819754,
regarding kfreebsd-10: GCC build: stack protector panic on boot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041056: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #818743,
regarding kfreebsd-10: Increase ARG_MAX to match the one from Linux
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041056: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #788174,
regarding kfreebsd-10: installer rescue mode grub entry
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041056: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #778367,
regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2014-7250 resource consumption issue
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:47:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041056: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #646997,
regarding kfreebsd-10: lock order reversal (bufwait vs dirhash) in ufs_direnter
to be marked as done.
This means that you
doesn't make sense to keep the
kfreebsd-10 package in the archive. The package is basically
unmaintained, the lastest upload was more than 3 years ago and there is
an RC bug for more than 2 years.
Thanks
Aurelien
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/07/msg00176.html
Package: kfreebsd-10
Severity: important
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-9, gcc-9-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version of gcc/g++, or
with gcc
kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087+ds1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2020-09-07
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
957230: freebsd-buildutils: ftbfs with GCC-10
https://bugs.debian.org/957230
964661: freebsd-glue: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns
kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087+ds1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2020-08-28
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
957230: freebsd-buildutils: ftbfs with GCC-10
https://bugs.debian.org/957230
964661: freebsd-glue: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns
kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087+ds1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2020-08-22
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
964661: freebsd-glue: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns
disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below
964698: freebsd-libs
kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-6 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2020-04-11
It is affected by these RC bugs:
944170: kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-8)
Hi!
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Sorry about that. I knew this was a relatively risky change, but
> thought I had test cases covering everything.
No problem. The refactoring is much appreciated, and it is
understandable when regressions happen somewhere in this labyrinth of
sh/bash/perl.
> Would you
On Sat, 2020-03-28 at 13:41 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
[...]
>
kfreebsd-10 FTBFS, due to probably this change in kernel-wedge:
>
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/kernel-wedge/-/commit/3827f1ee9f53540b104c592a8a2695f78d8629ed
[...]
On Sat, 2020-03-28 at 18:29 +,
tags -1 + patch
thanks
From 03477bf089926f7a599bbe89f67df53080b69bfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Chamberlain
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:12:35 +
Subject: [PATCH] preprocess: If source directory is a symlink, follow it
Closes: #955210
---
commands/preprocess | 9 +
debian/chan
Package: kernel-wedge
Version: 2.102
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Hi,
kfreebsd-10 FTBFS, due to probably this change in kernel-wedge:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/kernel-wedge/-/commit/3827f1ee9f53540b104c592a8a2695f78d8629ed
The kfreebsd-10 build
Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:50:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944170: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #944170,
regarding kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-8)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2020-04-10
It is affected by these RC bugs:
944170: kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-8)
Processing control commands:
> block 954831 with -1
Bug #954831 [ftp.debian.org] RM: gcc-8 -- ROM; superseded by gcc-9
954831 was not blocked by any bugs.
954831 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 954831: 944170
> severity -1 serious
Bug #944170 [kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-1
Control: block 954831 with -1
Control: severity -1 serious
On Tue, 05 Nov 2019 13:22:46 + Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: kfreebsd-10
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-8, gcc-8-legacy
&g
Package: kfreebsd-10
Severity: important
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-8, gcc-8-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version of gcc/g++, or
with gcc-9
Source: kfreebsd-10
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi, as a maintainer of flex-old package I'm considering requesting
removing it as obsolete and unmaintained version of flex. kfreebsd-10
Build-Depends on flex-old as alternative to current flex. Please build
the package only against current
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:35:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#892398: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #892398,
regarding kfreebsd-10: build-depends on GCC 6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kfreebsd-10
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l..
Source: kfreebsd-10
Severity: serious
Tags: sid buster
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: gcc-6-rm
Hi,
kfreebsd-10 build-depends on GCC 6. We now have GCC 7 (default) and
GCC 8 in the archive, so please make your package build with a newer
compiler (preferably the default one) again
Control: severity -1 serious
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:28:47PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> severity 868929 important
> thanks
>
> (linux-)amd64 is not in this package's Architectures: field, therefore
> FTBFS on that arch cannot be a RC bug? (Though I'd be interested in
> fixing it somed
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #868929 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: FTBFS:
../../../compat/ia32/ia32_genassym.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not
support PIC mode
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
868929: https://bugs.debian.or
severity 868929 important
thanks
(linux-)amd64 is not in this package's Architectures: field, therefore
FTBFS on that arch cannot be a RC bug? (Though I'd be interested in
fixing it someday).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 868929 important
Bug #868929 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: FTBFS:
../../../compat/ia32/ia32_genassym.c:1:0: error: code model kernel does not
support PIC mode
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
>
kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2017-08-17
It is affected by these RC bugs:
868929: kfreebsd-10: FTBFS: ../../../compat/ia32/ia32_genassym.c:1:0: error:
code model kernel does not support PIC mode
kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2017-08-17
It is affected by these RC bugs:
868929: kfreebsd-10: FTBFS: ../../../compat/ia32/ia32_genassym.c:1:0: error:
code model kernel does not support PIC mode
Source: kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.3~svn300087-3
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170719 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2017-02-18
It is affected by these RC bugs:
852006: kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-5)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:18:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#852006: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #852006,
regarding kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: src:kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.3~svn300087-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-5, gcc-5-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version
kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2017-01-24
It is affected by these RC bugs:
835950: kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-5)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2017 15:07:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#827072: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #827072,
regarding kfreebsd-10: use notify-reboot-required
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2017 15:07:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#835950: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #835950,
regarding kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fixed in 10.3 branch since r293897
> fixed 811278 kfreebsd-10/10.3~svn296373-1
Bug #811278 {Done: Steven Chamberlain } [src:kfreebsd-10]
kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1880: Linux compatibility layer incorrect futex handling
[SA-16:03]
Marked as
kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn300087-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2017-01-14
It is affected by these RC bugs:
811278: kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1880: Linux compatibility layer incorrect futex
handling [SA-16:03]
811279: kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1881: Linux compatibility layer setgroups(2)
system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 837289 important
Bug #837289 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: FTBFS: objcopy:linux32_vdso.so:
Invalid bfd target
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
severity 837289 important
thanks
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
This package's Architecture: fields do not include [linux-]amd64, so I
think this is not release-critical. It is desirable though that we can
fix it to become possible (again) to build
Package: kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.3~svn300087-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-5, gcc-5-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default version
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi,
Jon Boden wrote:
> notify-reboot-required is the Ubuntu way packages tell the user that a
> reboot is required (usually after an upgrade).
Patch applied in SVN, thanks!
Debian has this too (update-notifier-common) but I'm not sure if
it is typically installed. If
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #827072 [kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: use notify-reboot-required
Added tag(s) pending.
--
827072: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827072
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.3~svn300087-1
Tags: patch
Hi
If it's not too much noise, could you merge this small patch?
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntubsd/ubuntubsd/kfreebsd-10/diff/692?context=3
notify-reboot-required is the Ubuntu way packages tell the user that a reboo
Package: kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.3~svn300087-1
Tags: patch
Hi
When building kfreebsd-10 on ubuntuBSD, at least with current toolchain (and
possibly on Debian eventually), it fails with linker errors because the -lbsd
-ldb flags are not with the rest of the flags (-ll) and for some reason the
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 00:19:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824604: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u4
has caused the Debian Bug report #824604,
regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1886: Buffer overflow in keyboard driver
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 00:19:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824605: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u4
has caused the Debian Bug report #824605,
regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1887: Incorrect argument handling in sendmsg(2)
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: src:kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:18.atkbd.asc
Incorrect signedness comparison in the ioctl(2) handler allows a
malicious local user to overwrite a portion of the kernel memory.
This aff
Package: src:kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:19.sendmsg.asc
Incorrect argument handling in the socket code allows malicious local
user to overwrite large portion of the kernel memory.
This affects
control: close -1 10.3~svn296998-2
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 04:33:15PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > you may have stopped using it during the build, but you still have the
> > build-dep.
>
> The package in sid still uses clang; the one in experimental has
>
Processing control commands:
> close -1 10.3~svn296998-2
Bug #813727 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: update clang version
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #813727 to the same values
previously set
Bug #813727 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: update clang version
Marked Bug as d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # in experimental
> fixed 813727 kfreebsd-10/10.3~svn296998-2
Bug #813727 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: update clang version
Marked as fixed in versions kfreebsd-10/10.3~svn296998-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Hi,
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> you may have stopped using it during the build, but you still have the
> build-dep.
The package in sid still uses clang; the one in experimental has
switched to GCC and I hope to get that into sid within a week or so.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.or
control: reopen -1
you may have stopped using it during the build, but you still have the
build-dep.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #813727 {Done: Steven Chamberlain } [src:kfreebsd-10]
kfreebsd-10: update clang version
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bu
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:24:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#820151: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn297264-1~debug1
has caused the Debian Bug report #820151,
regarding kfreebsd-10: non-DFSG mode (for ubuntuBSD)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
you like a patch to do that?
I've committed my take on this as SVN r5987 of
svn://anonscm.debian.org/glibc-bsd/trunk/kfreebsd-10
This is our experimental 10.3 branch, however. I'm still testing it.
It will likely go into sid in the next couple of weeks.
> > I'm considering to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #820151 [kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: non-DFSG mode (for ubuntuBSD)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
820151: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820151
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:48:28 +0200
Jon Boden wrote:
>
> Hi Steven
>
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 01:15:33AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > My first thought is to use the Version field; that already
> > determines what SVN revision is checked out from which branch. If
> > it contained someth
Hi Steven
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 01:15:33AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> My first thought is to use the Version field; that already determines
> what SVN revision is checked out from which branch. If it contained
> something like "+nonfree", get-orig-source could retain the non-free
> st
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 01:09:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > + lsb-release,
>
> You don't need this, see below…
>
> > Standards-Version: 3.9.2
> >
> > Package: kfreebsd-source-@version@
> > Index: debian/rules
> > ===
> > -
Hi,
Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 23:17:08 +0200, Jon Boden wrote:
> > This patch has no effect on Debian but it enables "non-DFSG mode" when
> > compiling kfreebsd-10 on ubuntuBSD. Please could you apply it to make
> > it easier for us to resync
Hi!
On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 23:17:08 +0200, Jon Boden wrote:
> Package: kfreebsd-10
> Version: 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u3
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> This patch has no effect on Debian but it enables "non-DFSG mode" when
> compiling kfreebsd-10 on ubuntuBSD.
Package: kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi
This patch has no effect on Debian but it enables "non-DFSG mode" when
compiling kfreebsd-10 on ubuntuBSD. Please could you apply it to make it easier
for us to resync with kfreebsd-10?
It als
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2016 19:00:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#813727: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn296998-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #813727,
regarding kfreebsd-10: update clang version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: src:kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.3~svn296998-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
When compiled with GCC (rather than upstream default compiler Clang),
WITH_SSP (Stack Smashing Protection), kfreebsd-10 panics on boot.
The panic is in taskqueue_start_threads, just before it would start
zfskern I think
* Steven Chamberlain , 2016-03-20, 13:40:
I haven't seen this problem with Debian libreoffice builds (yet).
Possibly relevant commit:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git/commit/?id=0cfc2774303b
--
Jakub Wilk
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:25:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#818777: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn296998-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #818777,
regarding kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:25:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#818426: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.3~svn296998-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #818426,
regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1885: incorrect argument validation in
sysarch(2)
to be marked as done.
This means that
tags 818777 + pending
thanks
Fix pending in SVN r5955, which will go into experimental first
and then sid within a few weeks.
Not really an issue anyway since Clang is used instead of GCC on the
arches that really exist at the moment.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signatur
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 818777 + pending
Bug #818777 [kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build
(gcc-4.9)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
818777: http://bugs.debian.o
Package: kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.1~svn274115-10
Severity: important
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: non-standard-compiler, gcc-4.9, gcc-4.9-legacy
This package builds with a non standard compiler version; please check
if this package can be built with the default
forwarded 818743 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208154
tags 818743 + moreinfo
severity 818743 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
Jon Boden wrote:
> ARG_MAX is too small for building LibreOffice (errors out with
> "Argument list too long").
[...]
> I suggest increasing it to match with the Lin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 818743 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208154
Bug #818743 [kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: Increase ARG_MAX to match the one from
Linux
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bu
Package: kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.3~svn296373-2
ARG_MAX is too small for building LibreOffice (errors out with "Argument list
too long").
This was found when attempting to build LibreOffice on ubuntuBSD.
I suggest increasing it to match with the Linux value:
$ getconf ARG_MAX
2097152
kfreebsd-10, and also kfreebsd-9 in wheezy.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 10.1-0-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.
Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:59:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#818423: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u3
has caused the Debian Bug report #818423,
regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1883: Linux compatibility layer issetugid(2)
system call vulnerability
to be
ebian GNU/kFreeBSD
unless the system administrator has enabled it.
https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:10.linux.asc
This affects kfreebsd-10, and also kfreebsd-9 in wheezy.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unst
Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:59:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#818426: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u3
has caused the Debian Bug report #818426,
regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1885: incorrect argument validation in
sysarch(2)
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 818426 - patch + security
Bug #818426 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1885: incorrect argument
validation in sysarch(2)
Removed tag(s) patch.
Bug #818426 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1885: incorrect argument
validat
kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-10 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2016-02-15
It is affected by these RC bugs:
811277: kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1879: SCTP ICMPv6 error message vulnerability
[SA-16:01]
811278: kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1880: Linux compatibility layer incorrect futex
handling [SA
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 806241
Bug #813727 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: update clang version
813727 was not blocked by any bugs.
813727 was blocking: 812778
Added blocking bug(s) of 813727: 806241
--
813727: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813727
Debian
Control: block -1 by 806241
Hi,
Esa Peuha wrote:
> Currently freebsd-10 build-depends on clang-3.5 which is going to be
> removed (see bug #812778), so please update to a newer version.
kfreebsd-10 should build okay with clang-3.6, except that bug #806241
prevents us from switching yet.
Processing control commands:
> block 812778 by -1
Bug #812778 [ftp.debian.org] RM: llvm-toolchain-3.5 -- ROM; Old version
812778 was not blocked by any bugs.
812778 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 812778: 813727
--
812778: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=8127
Source: kfreebsd-10
Control: block 812778 by -1
Currently freebsd-10 build-depends on clang-3.5 which is going to be
removed (see bug #812778), so please update to a newer version.
kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-10 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2016-02-15
It is affected by these RC bugs:
811277: kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1879: SCTP ICMPv6 error message vulnerability
[SA-16:01]
811280: kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1882: TCP MD5 signature denial of service
[SA-16:05]
811278
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#811279: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #811279,
regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1881: Linux compatibility layer setgroups(2)
system call vulnerability [SA-16:04
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#811282: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #811282,
regarding kfreebsd-10: Invalid TCP checksums with pf(4) [EN-16:02]
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#811280: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #811280,
regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1882: TCP MD5 signature denial of service
[SA-16:05]
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#811277: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #811277,
regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1879: SCTP ICMPv6 error message vulnerability
[SA-16:01]
to be marked as done
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#811278: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #811278,
regarding kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1880: Linux compatibility layer incorrect futex
handling [SA-16:03]
to be marked
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 811281 kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u1
Bug #811281 {Done: Steven Chamberlain } [src:kfreebsd-10]
kfreebsd-10: filemon and bmake meta-mode stability issues [EN-16:01]
No longer marked as found in versions kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn274
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2016 02:23:10 +
with message-id <20160118022309.gd17...@pyro.eu.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#811281: kfreebsd-10: filemon and bmake meta-mode
stability issues [EN-16:01]
has caused the Debian Bug report #811281,
regarding kfreebsd-10: filemon and bmak
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 811278 kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1880: Linux compatibility layer
> incorrect futex handling [SA-16:03]
Bug #811278 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: CVE-2016-1880: Linux compatibility
layer incorrect futex handling [SA-16:02]
Changed Bug
g
TCP checksum on outgoing packets, when used with certain NICs,
likely causing connection problems or reduced performance:
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-16:02.pf.asc
This affects kfreebsd-10, and kfreebsd-9 in wheezy.
Processing control commands:
> found -1 10.1~svn274115-10
Bug #811282 [src:kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: Invalid TCP checksums with pf(4)
[EN-16:02]
Marked as found in versions kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn274115-10.
--
811282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811282
Debian Bug Track
1 - 100 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
