On 01/09/2013 22:40, Robert Millan wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain:
>> On 01/09/13 18:04, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> [...] maybe we should move the modules to /boot like
>>> upstream does? And make /lib/modules a symlink or something.
>>
>> Yes I think so. It already works with grub2 (it resolves the sy
Steven Chamberlain:
> On 01/09/13 18:04, Robert Millan wrote:
>> [...] maybe we should move the modules to /boot like
>> upstream does? And make /lib/modules a symlink or something.
>
> Yes I think so. It already works with grub2 (it resolves the symlink
> for paths used in grub.cfg), and it seem
On 01/09/13 18:04, Robert Millan wrote:
> [...] maybe we should move the modules to /boot like
> upstream does? And make /lib/modules a symlink or something.
Yes I think so. It already works with grub2 (it resolves the symlink
for paths used in grub.cfg), and it seems justified by the FHS too:
h
Steven Chamberlain:
> A few times I've had GRUB unable to boot from ZFS for various reasons.
> Now I prefer to make /boot a separate partition, and also move
> /lib/modules into /boot/, making it a symlink to there. That way
> everything needed to boot the kernel is on plain UFS, but everything
>
Hi,
On 31/08/13 21:45, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Since I upgraded grub to -18 (and did a lot of other things without
> rebooting) I get into the rescue mode "checksum verification failed"
> -- same error for insmod normal. *Might* also be I broke my ZFS
> root. I'll now try recover my notebook.
A
hi!
Since I upgraded grub to -18 (and did a lot of other things without
rebooting) I get into the rescue mode "checksum verification failed"
-- same error for insmod normal. *Might* also be I broke my ZFS
root. I'll now try recover my notebook.
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
6 matches
Mail list logo
