2011/10/31 Aurelien Jarno :
> It's worse than that, gcc-4.6 builds fine in the build daemon if the
> build is done directly in the chroot or started directly by calling
> sbuild. The problem only appears when the buildd process calls sbuild,
> which makes things difficult to debug.
Maybe something
2011/10/31 Aurelien Jarno :
> The next step is probably to do the next source uploads with another
> architecture than amd64, to see if the problem is reproducible on the
> amd64 build daemon.
It's already been, see:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gcc-4.6&arch=amd64
--
Robert Mil
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:43:03PM +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Robert Millan writes:
> >> Matthias tried to disable parallel builds on kfreebsd-*:
> >>
> >> ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_TARGET_ARCH), kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386))
> >> USE_NJOBS = no
> >> endif
> >>
> >> but it looks like the DEB_BU
Robert Millan writes:
>> Matthias tried to disable parallel builds on kfreebsd-*:
>>
>> ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_TARGET_ARCH), kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386))
>> USE_NJOBS = no
>> endif
>>
>> but it looks like the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS on fano overrode him:
>>
>> # Support parallel= in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
2011/10/29 Ludovic Brenta :
> Robert Millan writes:
>> 2011/10/27 Matthias Klose :
>>> looks like bug #637236 is back again. is this a buildd issue again?
>>> can the package be built locally?
>>
>> The #637236 log suggests that the problem is likely to be a race
>> condition. About one month ago
Robert Millan writes:
> 2011/10/27 Matthias Klose :
>> looks like bug #637236 is back again. is this a buildd issue again?
>> can the package be built locally?
>
> The #637236 log suggests that the problem is likely to be a race
> condition. About one month ago, Petr asked [1] if parallel build
>
2011/10/27 Matthias Klose :
> looks like bug #637236 is back again. is this a buildd issue again? can the
> package be built locally?
The #637236 log suggests that the problem is likely to be a race
condition. About one month ago, Petr asked [1] if parallel build
could be disabled. In the bug log
looks like bug #637236 is back again. is this a buildd issue again? can the
package be built locally?
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ea9930
8 matches
Mail list logo
