Re: Bug#728919: freebsd-libs transition

2014-02-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 21:54:22 +, Robert Millan wrote: > > Unless I missed something, only two packages remain. And the maintainers > haven't > responded so far. > > What would be a suitable delay for delayed-queue NMUs? > Assuming the RC bugs are at least a week old, without reply, I'd

freebsd-libs transition

2014-02-05 Thread Robert Millan
Unless I missed something, only two packages remain. And the maintainers haven't responded so far. What would be a suitable delay for delayed-queue NMUs? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: Bug#728919: freebsd-libs transition

2014-01-20 Thread Robert Millan
On 20/01/2014 11:04, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 22:44:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> >> There are a couple of ABI chan

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2013-12-25 Thread Robert Millan
Any thoughts about this? The new release is getting closer (10.0-RC3 is already overdue by a few days). On 06/11/2013 22:44, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > There are a couple of ABI c

freebsd-libs transition

2013-11-06 Thread Robert Millan
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition There are a couple of ABI changes coming to freebsd-libs. They're in soon-to-be-released 10.x branch, so it may yet take a while until we get them through upstream release upgrade. Howev

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2012-02-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 20:45 +, Robert Millan wrote: > El 14 de febrer de 2012 20:53, Adam D. Barratt > ha escrit: > > I've scheduled binNMUs for the first level of packages on the transition > > tracker (URL above). Note that in the process I discovered that > > freebsd-libs no longer builds

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2012-02-15 Thread Robert Millan
El 14 de febrer de 2012 20:53, Adam D. Barratt ha escrit: >> kfreebsd-*: >> libsbuf-dev is needed for a build system component, which is not >> installed in kfreebsd package. > > So there's no need to binNMU them? No. >> libsdl1.2: >> It was built without usb support because configure probe fail

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2012-02-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 16:23 +, Robert Millan wrote: > El 12 de febrer de 2012 12:53, Adam D. Barratt > ha escrit: > > Looking at > > http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/freebsd-libs.html , there are > > several packages which build-depend on a -dev package produced by > > freebsd-libs b

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2012-02-12 Thread Robert Millan
El 12 de febrer de 2012 12:53, Adam D. Barratt ha escrit: > Looking at > http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/freebsd-libs.html , there are > several packages which build-depend on a -dev package produced by > freebsd-libs but don't have a run-time dependency; what's the situation > with the

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2012-02-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 20:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 20:00 +, Robert Millan wrote: > > Anyhow, is there something I can do to help at this point? Just let me > > know. > > Being prepared to handle any issues quickly when they come up, mainly. Looking at http://r

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2012-02-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 20:00 +, Robert Millan wrote: > El 4 de febrer de 2012 19:44, Adam D. Barratt > ha escrit: > The libraries produced by freebsd-libs are > > used by other packages, some of which will at various points be involved > > in other transitions (and indeed may be right now), s

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2012-02-04 Thread Robert Millan
Hi Adam, El 4 de febrer de 2012 19:44, Adam D. Barratt ha escrit: > On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 19:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 19:09 +, Robert Millan wrote: >>> > Should we wait until the current transition is >> > > over, or upload to unstable with the new sonames as

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2012-02-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 19:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 19:09 +, Robert Millan wrote: >> > Should we wait until the current transition is > > > over, or upload to unstable with the new sonames as soon as possible? So, re-reading this, I realised that you were only ask

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2012-02-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 19:09 +, Robert Millan wrote: > FYI after freebsd-libs 8.3 has migrated to testing, freebsd-libs 9.0 > has been uploaded to unstable. Out of interest, how did the lack of an ACK or NACK to your question, less than a week ago, of: > Should we wait until the current transi

Re: freebsd-libs transition

2012-02-04 Thread Robert Millan
FYI after freebsd-libs 8.3 has migrated to testing, freebsd-libs 9.0 has been uploaded to unstable. -release: Please can you take appropiate measures to begin the transition? El 29 de gener de 2012 14:43, Robert Millan ha escrit: > [ Please CC me, not subscribed! ] > > Hi! > > We have an incomin

freebsd-libs transition

2012-01-29 Thread Robert Millan
[ Please CC me, not subscribed! ] Hi! We have an incoming soname bump in freebsd-libs (libusb, libusbhid, libcam and libsbuf). Should we wait until the current transition is over, or upload to unstable with the new sonames as soon as possible? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de