tags 763685 +pending
thanks
Hallo,
* Guillem Jover [Thu, Oct 02 2014, 05:23:09AM]:
> > @@ -22,8 +24,10 @@
> > override_dh_install:
> > dh_install $(shell test -e build/acngfs || echo -Xacngfs)
> > sed -e s,^Type=simple,Type=notify, < systemd/apt-cacher-n
Hi!
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 22:20:31 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> In addition to fixing the syntax error in include/dlcon.h, the attached
> packaging changes seem to allow apt-cacher-ng to still build on
> non-Linux, and the sysvinit scripts still work to start and stop it.
> d
tags 763685 + patch
thanks
Hi,
In addition to fixing the syntax error in include/dlcon.h, the attached
packaging changes seem to allow apt-cacher-ng to still build on
non-Linux, and the sysvinit scripts still work to start and stop it.
(Not sure if dh-systemd should be disabled; it did not
Package: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 0.8.0~rc3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
apt-cacher-ng FTBFS on non-Linux architectures. Firstly, this line of
code seems to be incorrect syntax in C++11, I guess because of the new
initialiser list feature:
--- include/dlcon.h.orig2014-09-20 11:52:07.0
clone 732937 -1
retitle -1 apt: kfreebsd: ioctl(TIOCSCTTY) fails, stair-stepped text
severity -1 normal
notfixed -1 apt/0.9.12.1
notfound -1 apt/0.9.13~exp1
notfound -1 apt/0.9.14.2
found -1 apt/1.0.7
thanks
On 29/08/14 12:34, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I still get error messages like this
[ CC'ing debian-bsd@l.d.o ]
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:28:40AM +0100, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.9.15.5
> Severity: important
> Tags: d-i
> User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: hurd
> Control: found -1 0.9.15.2
> Control: notfound -
Hello,
You should avoid upgrading your apt package to 0.9.15.1: it
unconditionally uses futimens, which is not supported on hurd-any, and
apparently not on kfreebsd-any either.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:04:34PM +0100, pe...@kahn.nu wrote:
> Hi and thanks for all your hard work.
> I have just tried updating my debian hurd install and dpkg fails with the
> following error:
>
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/sysvinit_2.88dsf-16_hurd-
Hi and thanks for all your hard work.
I have just tried updating my debian hurd install and dpkg fails with the
following error:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/sysvinit_2.88dsf-16_hurd-i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/sbin/halt', which is also in package hurd
Package: src:python-apt
Version: 0.8.3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd
2011/8/1 Arno Töll :
> wow, that's cool! I'd love having this in Debian. Please note, apt-clone
> - - as you linked it - depends on grub 1, not grub-pc. I noticed that
> while having a quick look into the code, e.g.:
I know. SUN used to be quite interested in GRUB 2. One of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 01.08.2011 00:38, Robert Millan wrote:
> * Package name : apt-clone
> Version : 0.7.9nexenta28
..
> It manages GRUB menu and ZFS 'syspool'
> filesystems. Two upgrade methods supported: 1) safe upgrades via
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: apt-clone
Version : 0.7.9nexenta28
* URL : see below
* License : CDDL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : ZFS integrated APT package handling utility
apt-clone is the command-line tool for handling
Bonenti
To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011, 13:16
Subject: Re: apt-get -- doesn't install dependancies?
On Mar, Febbraio 15, 2011 11:12, Kostya Berger wrote:
> This is it: KDE-plasma-desktop!
> I tried to figure out a package including "desktop"
On Mar, Febbraio 15, 2011 11:12, Kostya Berger wrote:
> This is it: KDE-plasma-desktop!
> I tried to figure out a package including "desktop" by typing `apt-cache
> search desktop", but it gave off too much of stuff, and I was on a tty
> console only.
Next time tr
This is it: KDE-plasma-desktop!
I tried to figure out a package including "desktop" by typing `apt-cache search
desktop", but it gave off too much of stuff, and I was on a tty console only.
OK, thanks. My question has been answered.
From: Robert Millan
To: Kostya Berger
2011/2/15 Kostya Berger :
> So... My strategy was quite simple: I just figured I'd tell apt-get to
> install a random KDE4 application (I chose lilypond for this), and it will
> install all the rest of the desktop software as "dependencies". Well, it did
> ins
quot;debian-bsd@lists.debian.org"
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February 2011, 11:47
Subject: Re: apt-get -- doesn't install dependancies?
> So... My strategy was quite simple: I just figured I'd tell apt-get to
> install a random KDE4 application (I chose lilypond for this), and it will
&
So... My strategy was quite simple: I just figured I'd tell apt-get to install
a random KDE4 application (I chose lilypond for this), and it will install all
the rest of the desktop
software as "dependencies". Well, it did install a lot of KDE4 files as
dependencies of lilyp
ying to find out the solution to these,
so that folks could securely follow these steps.
So, it seems apt-get didn't install dependencies, when I tried to install KDE4
with it.
First of all, I didn't install with debian istaller, but from command line
using `debootstrap` to install ba
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.10
Severity: important
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
$ sudo apt-cdrom add
Using CD-ROM mount point /media/cdrom/
Unmounting CD-ROM
Waiting for disc...
Please insert a Disc in the drive and press enter
Mounting CD-ROM...
E: Failed to mount the cdrom
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.1.5-2
Severity: normal
I just installed Debian/KFreeBSD with the daily-image of debian-installer from
2010-01-21. I edited /etc/apt/sources.list, runned aptitude, and pressed u.
I got:
Ouch! Got SIGSEV, dying..
Ouch! Got SIGSEV, dying..
Segmentation fault
So I
Daniel Schepler writes:
> Package: ia32-apt-get
> Version: 20
> Severity: normal
>
> In a pbuilder amd64 chroot, after installing ia32-apt-get and doing an
> apt-get
> update (unsetting DEBIAN_FRONTEND so that I could choose the "All" option in
> the debco
package of NetBSD's make
("netbsd-make" - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=194260),
which is a Build-Depend. It seems the apt archive holding that, and possibly
more of the old netbsd-i386 port, is gone: http://debian-bsd.lightbearer.com/
You can also try to
semble the
live ISO/NFSroot from pure binaries).
One thing that would help is the purported-to-exist package of NetBSD's make
("netbsd-make" - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=194260),
which is a Build-Depend. It seems the apt archive holding that, and possibly
mo
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> apt 0.7.5 is broken on both kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64, DO NOT
> UPGRADE it!
>
> I am working on a fix.
It is fixed in 0.7.6 which should now be on all mirrors.
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:55:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> apt 0.7.5 is broken on both kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64, DO NOT
> UPGRADE it!
A new package is now available, and as I was bitten by this problem,
here's the workaround (might be helpful for others):
$
apt 0.7.5 is broken on both kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64, DO NOT
UPGRADE it!
I am working on a fix.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, February 21, 2007 10:46:44 +0100 Petr Salinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or locally "apt-cache search cyrus".
Thanks, didn't know about that one ... definitely faster/easier then hitting
er software, like php4, have
meta-packages that guarantee something or another (try "apt-cache search
meta-package" for example). I don't know if there's a guideline for this kind
of thing, but in the case of cyrus it seems that you will have to install two
separate package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tried that, but, of course, that brings up *everything*, including SASL stuff
... now, there is a '-common' package, so is that what I'd be looking for ... ?
- --On Wednesday, February 21, 2007 10:10:54 +0200 Konstantinos Koukopoulos
<[EMAIL PROT
7; to download, that
includes all the bits? Or do ppl really just fumble through like this? :(
why not search for 'cyrus' ?
Or locally "apt-cache search cyrus".
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 05:47, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> The fun part I'm having is knowing what to install ... for instance, I'm
> using http://packages.debian.org to search for cyrus-imapd ... of course,
> if I search for that, I only get the imapd part, not the pop3d stuff ... is
> there s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The fun part I'm having is knowing what to install ... for instance, I'm using
http://packages.debian.org to search for cyrus-imapd ... of course, if I search
for that, I only get the imapd part, not the pop3d stuff ... is there some way
of searchi
erate URLs on kfreebsd and wget
them on other machine.
1) "apt-get --print-uris update"
It produces lines as
'http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian/dists/unreleased/main/source/Sources.bz2'
ftp.gnuab.org_debian_dists_unreleased_main_source_Sources 0
So, wget http://ftp.gnuab.org/deb
with 12GB IDE, 192MB memory, no
notworking). I added all 12 installation cdroms via "apt-cdrom add" to
the "/etc/apt/sources.list", but running "apt-get install
x-window-system-core" results in "Package x-window-system-core is not
available, but is referred to
cdroms via "apt-cdrom add" to the
"/etc/apt/sources.list", but running "apt-get install
x-window-system-core" results in "Package x-window-system-core is not
available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the
package is missing, has been o
Hello,
I have uploaded to my repository an apt that does not segfault and
generally appears to approximate working :-)
It's built with GCC 3.3, which is also present at that repository.
My /etc/apt/sources.list looks like this:
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contri
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 05:02:03PM -0400, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
>
> You might want to make sure there aren't any changes in FreeBSD cvs
> that haven't been merged upstream. I've run into problems in the past
> with FreeBSD not pushing diffs (or not making it in). (binutils and gcc
> come to mind r
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:22:41PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> I just checked debian's ppp sources and it supports FreeBSD's kernel. I
> haven't tried, but in a quick look seems like adding "GNU/FreeBSD" to
> ./configure would get it working (stealing kernel options from "FreeBSD"
> and user opti
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:37:42PM -0400, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
>
> I believe that FreeBSD has a variant of the same pppd. I don't know how
> out of sync it is with the upstream sources, though. IIRC, I believe
> there are two or three different ways to do PPP on FreeBSD.
>
> If porting Debian's
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:24:18PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 03:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I don't know why, but I could not list any files via ftp in linux. however
> > on a
> > dos console I didn't have any trowble, I have to download this files on
>
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 03:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> I don't know why, but I could not list any files via ftp in linux. however on
> a
> dos console I didn't have any trowble, I have to download this files on linux,
> because pppd is not ported yet:
fixed, thanks.
btw pp
ote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> ls
227 Entering Passive Mode (80,24,13,86,199,36)
150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for '/bin/ls'.
226 Transfer complete.
ftp> cd pub apt
250 CWD command successful.
ftp> ls
227 Entering Passive Mode (80,24,13
hi,
I just finished setting up an APT repository for GNU/FreeBSD. check it out:
deb ftp://khazad.dyndns.org/pub/apt unstable main
(you need to add this line to /etc/apt/sources.list)
btw, the server is running a GNU/FreeBSD system too :)
--
Robert Millan
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:15:29PM +0100, Xavier de Labouret wrote:
>
> > Given that upstream is currently incorporating the autotools updates,
> > and as such, our local autotools-dev should have them (either as a
> > local patch, or a new upstream version) in the near future...
>
> This is a ve
> Given that upstream is currently incorporating the autotools updates,
> and as such, our local autotools-dev should have them (either as a
> local patch, or a new upstream version) in the near future...
This is a very good news.
> ... I'm
> inclined to try to go the "right" way, with a real ar
ot;impossible to pass the nth install
> step" and are now at the "can you fix this XFree bug on the default
> installation?" status.
>
> If there is anything i can say, it is thank you guys for this work.
>
> So, as a simple user, i am wondering if time has come t
on the default
installation?" status.
If there is anything i can say, it is thank you guys for this work.
So, as a simple user, i am wondering if time has come to merge the two
Debian/NetBSD apt-get repositories. The fact that my bug reports on IRC
concern more high-level packages lets me think th
this to the fts API and it now compiles, but
I've obviously screwed up somewhere in that it segfaults instead...
> FWIW, I do have apt basically working on FreeBSD. It segfaulted quite a bit at
> first, but seems to be working better, now that I recompiled it with gcc 3.0.
> It m
plain won't work. I disabled it in the Makefile. I haven't tried real
hard to fix it, because I felt there were other things that were more urgent.
If you figure out what's wrong with it, I'd be quite interested...
FWIW, I do have apt basically working on FreeBSD. It segfaulted
. Hacking environment.mak.in so that it produces shared
libraries has let me produce a working apt with which I've just retrieved
a source package. apt-ftparchive is still segfaulting, presumably due to
me screwing up somewhere in that patch. Other than that:
cysteine:/source/stage2/debs# uname -a
N
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 03:55:32AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The COMPILING doc actually implies that the shared library problem and the
> "Unable to determine a suitable system type" may be linked. Again, this is
> probably a post-sleep problem.
Oh, no, got it. Unless a certain set of magic
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 03:53:29AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> apt now builds - diff attached. The package still won't build due to lack
> of doc generation (missing debian-sgml), and for some reason that I
> haven't been able to work out the shared libraries for libapt-pkg
apt now builds - diff attached. The package still won't build due to lack
of doc generation (missing debian-sgml), and for some reason that I
haven't been able to work out the shared libraries for libapt-pkg aren't
generated which also trips up the production of the packages. It&#x
> Fully agreed. So perhaps the proposal should expand to include the kernel
> as well as libc packages.
>
> Perhaps:
>
> libc-gnu-6.1
> kernel-source-linux-2.4.17
> kernel-headers-linux-2.4.17
I would prefer something like:
freebsd-kernel-4.3
freebsd-source-4.3
freebsd-libc4
linux-kernel-2.4.1
> Take into account that Debian was never made for any other kernel than
> Linux. The Hurd port was only started in 1998 and we still have some
> problems with the linuxism of Debian.
>
> The architecture names is one example. It's just i386 and no way talks
> about the kernel. This wasn't a real
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 10:11:19PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:07:28PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> > Note that kernel-headers should be linux-headers actually. :))
> > Kernel-headers should be some meta package depending on the right
> > headers for the right p
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:07:28PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> I propose a more flexible scheme. All ports should have the
> name -,
Well, using the GNU names would be good.
Anyway, see
http://master.debian.org/~brinkmd/arch-handling.txt
> Note that kernel-headers should be linux-headers act
Hi!
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 19:07:28 Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
(CC'd debian-hurd as the people there may also be interested)
There is already a wishlist item filed about it, but only the way
suggested is not the Right Way IMHO:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=118910&repeatmerged=yes
I spok
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:07:28PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> I propose a more flexible scheme. All ports should have the
> name -, i.e. hurd-i386, netbsd-alpha,
FYI, apt-get already works this way.
Gerhard.
(CC'd debian-hurd as the people there may also be interested)
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:45:09AM -0800, ivan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:45:01PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > Thanks to Mr. Colin's excellent work, groff and groff-base are now present
> > in the archive, built from the new ca
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:45:01PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> Thanks to Mr. Colin's excellent work, groff and groff-base are now present
> in the archive, built from the new canonical sources. This should make some
> number of other packages buildable now... groff-x11 will follow once the
> X11 stu
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:11:38PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:37:43AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 07:36:13PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > Currently it has some of the base SGML packages and a few things that are
> > > useful for pulling down o
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:37:43AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 07:36:13PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > Currently it has some of the base SGML packages and a few things that are
> > useful for pulling down other packages or compile work. More will be on its
> > way soon (cur
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:37:43AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'm working on an experimental upload of groff which should make life a
> bit easier there; it should be ready in the next couple of days for
> somebody to try to build. Does NetBSD have ?
Yes.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 07:36:13PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> Currently it has some of the base SGML packages and a few things that are
> useful for pulling down other packages or compile work. More will be on its
> way soon (current goal: get groff working so that many things which use it
> for do
properly detected
by dpkg-buildpackage?
On another sidenote... it seems that the state of the base chroot is still
broken enough that packages are considered flawed (and thus, APT won't work
inside it directly). I'm working on recompiling all of the Essential ones
that I can get to wor
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 01:36:51PM +0100, Wessel Dankers wrote:
> On 2002-01-20 21:58:11-0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > On a sidenote... I'm a bit worried at the errors I'm seeing out of the
> > shared-lib dependancy autogenerator stuff. Is this still broken? (I don't
> > mind re-building all of the p
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 09:58:11PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> On a sidenote... I'm a bit worried at the errors I'm seeing out of the
> shared-lib dependancy autogenerator stuff. Is this still broken? (I don't
> mind re-building all of the packages, once it's fixed, if so, but I would
> sort of lik
At least on FreeBSD, shared objects can't be ldd'd, which happens to be
exactly what debhelper does. Perhaps these .so's don't include information
for ldd to extract? It's really weird, because it's supposed to be ELF.
fortunately, on NetBSD, this isn't an issue. our ldd(1) is actua
On 2002-01-20 21:58:11-0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> On a sidenote... I'm a bit worried at the errors I'm seeing out of the
> shared-lib dependancy autogenerator stuff. Is this still broken? (I don't
> mind re-building all of the packages, once it's fixed, if so, but I would
> sort of like to know...)
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 07:36:13PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> An APT-able (once apt is working) archive of the packages I have done so
> far can be found by using the following entry in sources.list:
>
> deb http://debian-bsd.lightbearer.com/debian-bsd unstable main contrib
> no
An APT-able (once apt is working) archive of the packages I have done so
far can be found by using the following entry in sources.list:
deb http://debian-bsd.lightbearer.com/debian-bsd unstable main contrib non-free
I'm working on having a saner setup to put packages in, including a deb-sr
non-US main contrib
non-free
I haven't tested with binaries - apt-get source foo seems to work here.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sam Hartman
Matthew> wrote:
>> Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread.
>> Does anyone have apt
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread. Does anyone
> have apt-get working (instead of segfaulting) using the apt in the
> distributed chroot? If so, how? If not, does anyone have apt work
Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread. Does anyone
have apt-get working (instead of segfaulting) using the apt in the
distributed chroot? If so, how? If not, does anyone have apt working
using other builds?
Hi Sam,
unfortunatly not y
>>>>> "utsl" == utsl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
utsl> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread.
>> Does anyone have apt-get working (instead of s
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread. Does anyone
> have apt-get working (instead of segfaulting) using the apt in the
> distributed chroot? If so, how? If not, does anyone have apt work
Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread. Does anyone
have apt-get working (instead of segfaulting) using the apt in the
distributed chroot? If so, how? If not, does anyone have apt working
using other builds?
Hi Matthew,
the fix you gave to me is still not working 100%
and I can't get apt to compile.
Here are the other errors Im getting:
In file included from writer.h:25,
from apt-ftparchive.cc:32:
cachedb.h: In method `bool CacheDB::Get()':
cachedb.h:54: argument
our work system (debian), although i don't know if that will
ever fully happen without systemV init scripts (one of the few things
besides apt i miss on *bsd).
on another note, do people think that there's enough resources
(person-wise) to support developing an entirely new set of packag
Dan Papasian wrote:
> Someone has written a pkg_add/ports wrapper
> to emulate apt. [...]
> Perhaps this will suffice as more proof that ports/packages (aka
> pkgsrc) is closer to deb/dpkg/apt than most people here seem
> to think.
I doubt this will be useful to the debian-bs
Someone has written a pkg_add/ports wrapper
to emulate apt. It's suffering from bitrot,
and lack of documentation, but here it is:
http://www.hci.net/~ahze/fbsd-apt-2.0r1.tar.gz
Perhaps this will suffice as more proof that ports/packages (aka
pkgsrc) is closer to deb/dpkg/apt than most p
o
the advantages of sticking with a system we know and love (Debian =).
Anyhow, I took a few moments to gather up what I had done. I *believe*
these are the right set of sources. Here is the URL:
http://www.allusion.net/bard/debian-bsd/
apt*.tar.gz is the modified source tarball for apt, and dpkg*.ta
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 05:57:45PM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> Does anyone have patches so I can easily compile apt and dpkg under
> NetBSD (or maybe OpenBSD)?
>
> I tried at first to edit the apt-0.3.17 Makefile and then use gmake (under
> NetBSD 1.4.1), but something hung my m
Does anyone have patches so I can easily compile apt and dpkg under
NetBSD (or maybe OpenBSD)?
I tried at first to edit the apt-0.3.17 Makefile and then use gmake (under
NetBSD 1.4.1), but something hung my machine -- maybe stuck in some forked
loop.
I am definitely interested in using an apt
d for the
source and download it first; to download the source automagically (assuming,
again, that you have apt working)
apt-get source PACKAGE
cd PACKAGE-VERSION
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot [1]
or
apt-get -c source package
to download and compile.
Daniel
[1] You probably should just
On Wednesday 2 February 2000, at 0 h 20, the keyboard of Dan Potter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone tell me the canonical way to compile a deb from the source
> stuff (orig tarball, dsc, diff)? Or point me to a description of how to do
> it?
If you have all the Debian tools:
dpkg-sour
I recall waay back on Feb 01 when Peter M Kahle wrote:
> Well, on Debian you can use a chrooted environment to simulate (for
> example) the stable distribution on a box with unstable, so is this a
> case where using that jail tool that was mentioned on the list would
> help?
Probably.. the prob
On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 11:30:31PM -0600, Dan Potter wrote:
> I'm going to attempt to kill that other subject line =)
>
> I guess the next question is how to test dpkg without destroying the BSD
> system... ^_^;;
Well, on Debian you can use a chrooted environment to simulate (for
example) the sta
I'm going to attempt to kill that other subject line =)
Anyway, I just successfully did a package [U]pdate using dselect/apt and
I'm looking at a shiny new package listing with the default Debian
packages selected, on my FreeBSD box.
I guess the next question is how to test dp
93 matches
Mail list logo
