Hi,
On 17/08/12 11:56, Robert Millan wrote:
>> [...] It seems likely we would want to release 9.1
>> through t-p-u, for the first point release after wheezy. [...]
>
> It's harder than it looks. It wouldn't surprise me if this forced
> upgrade of userland part of the stack too, like transition to
2012/8/13 Steven Chamberlain :
> The 9.0 kernel was meant to receive upstream security support only until
> the end of January 2013. It seems likely we would want to release 9.1
> through t-p-u, for the first point release after wheezy. 9.1 could then
> be expected to get extended security suppor
The 9.0 kernel was meant to receive upstream security support only until
the end of January 2013. It seems likely we would want to release 9.1
through t-p-u, for the first point release after wheezy. 9.1 could then
be expected to get extended security support of two years from its
release, which
Hi,
Firstly I notice that 9.1-RC1 is tagged in upstream SVN and probably
being built right now. The release was originally due for August but
now looks more like it could be September/October:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html
The 9.0 kernel was meant to receive upstream secur
4 matches
Mail list logo
