David Prévot wrote:
> is it safe to close this bug
Yes, it is -- I'm doing it now. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ipwop9hv.GNUs_Not_Unix!%ya.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
severity 419081 wishlist
Hi,
As Guillem already stated [1] that “GNU/NetBSD” was correctly used, and
since a recent note added to the Debian GNU/NetBSD homepage [2] states
that “this page is only for historical purposes”, is it safe to close
this b
tags 419081 - patch
thanks
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:00:14PM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The Debian GNU/kNetBSD port is referred incorrectly as "GNU/NetBSD".
>
> No, the port is correctly referred, becuse it's based on the NetBSD libc
> and BSD userland. So it's not like in the GNU/k*BSD port
Hi,
Thanks for taking the time for this!
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 18:42:45 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> [(X-Debbugs-)CCing the porters' list]
>·
> The Debian GNU/kNetBSD port is referred incorrectly as "GNU/NetBSD".
> I assume this mist
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
Tags: patch
[(X-Debbugs-)CCing the porters' list]
The Debian GNU/kNetBSD port is referred incorrectly as "GNU/NetBSD".
I assume this mistake was not intentional and the pages just haven't
been updated for a while. By contrast, this is not the case with
5 matches
Mail list logo
