fredag den 14 januari 2011 klockan 11:51 skrev Bjoern A. Zeeb detta:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
>>>
>>> perhaps be the proper forum for this?
>>
>> I hacke
fredag den 14 januari 2011 klockan 11:51 skrev Bjoern A. Zeeb detta:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
>>
>>> The current implementation is indeed very simple:
>> ...
>>> I think you need to discuss with upstream whether they
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
The current implementation is indeed very simple:
...
I think you need to discuss with upstream whether they want to extend
this compatibility wrapper or rather see us port the applications to
th
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
The current implementation is indeed very simple:
...
I think you need to discuss with upstream whether they want to extend
this compatibility wrapper or rather see us port the applications to
the native interface. Would
http://lists.freebsd.or
Hi,
Mats Erik Andersson writes:
> as I learned in another message [1] the fact that
> "/proc/net/dev" lists wrong interface names (eth0 and
> similar) might be easily mended. However, much worse
> is the fact that "/proc/net/dev" seems never to be
> updated, thus rendering many networking tools u
Hello,
as I learned in another message [1] the fact that
"/proc/net/dev" lists wrong interface names (eth0 and
similar) might be easily mended. However, much worse
is the fact that "/proc/net/dev" seems never to be
updated, thus rendering many networking tools useless
for GNU/kFreeBSD. Statistics
6 matches
Mail list logo
