Hi Mattias,
glibmm2.4 built fine after given back. I asked for help on the #debian-
buildd IRC channel. Maybe you can do the same next time too.
On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 04:53 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I sent this to the wb-team list, but there was no response. But they
> are probably
: Request to give back glibmm2.4 on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-
i386
Datum: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 05:48:01 +0200
The builds of glibmm2.4 2.56.0-2 on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386
failed with:
error: 'g_application_set_option_context_parameter_string' was not
declared in this scope
Ac
Hi Steven,
Glad to see you back on the mailing list!
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Svante Signell
wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 09:17 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Svante Signell wrote:
>> > The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building
>> > packages for th
On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 09:17 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Svante Signell wrote:
> > The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building
> > packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for
> > your effort making this happening jrtc27 :)
>
> Thanks very mu
Hi,
Svante Signell wrote:
> The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building
> packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for your
> effort making this happening jrtc27 :)
Thanks very much for this James! It was a really nice surprise to see
packages building ag
Hi all,
Cc: debian-devel
The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building
packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for your
effort making this happening jrtc27 :) The buildd is now soon up-to-
date building packages being outdated. As you know GNU/Hurd packages
following messages
are logged:
dovecot: imap: Error: Auth request missing a file descriptor
dovecot: imap-login: Error: read(imap) failed: Remote closed connection
(service's process_limit reached?)
When direcly invoking imap (mutt's set tunnel=/usr/lib/dovecot/imap),
all is wel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 749157 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190204
Bug #749157 [freebsd-libs] Please add an empty #define LIBUSB_CALL in libusb.h
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190204'.
> thanks
Stoppi
forwarded 749157 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190204
thanks
Forwarded the bug to
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190204
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
2013/6/20 Adam D. Barratt :
> Out of interest, where did you get the version scheme "+deb70.1" from? I
> don't think I've seen that one before (our suggested version would have been
> +deb7u1, as per dev-ref).
Steven just pointed out (correctly). I take note that +deb7u1 is
preferred. Hopefully I
On 20/06/13 13:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2013-06-20 0:25, Robert Millan wrote:
>> +kfreebsd-downloader (9.0-3+deb70.1) stable; urgency=low
>> +
>> + * Switch to people.debian.org URL for kernel.txz download.
>> +(Closes: #712816)
>
> Out of interest, where did you get the version scheme
On 2013-06-20 0:25, Robert Millan wrote:
+kfreebsd-downloader (9.0-3+deb70.1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Switch to people.debian.org URL for kernel.txz download.
+(Closes: #712816)
Out of interest, where did you get the version scheme "+deb70.1" from?
I don't think I've seen that one befor
Apologies for sending the request after uploading, but as I tend to do
this about once every few years, I forget very easily.
kfreebsd-downloader broke because the URL it relied on is now
returning 404 error. So, a different URL is being used now.
Debdiff:
diff -Nru kfreebsd-downloader-9.0
On 26/06/12 18:02, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> I would greatly appreciate if you could test the build again. I don't have
> access to a kfreebsd machine and hence I'm unable to test this on time before
> the freeze.
Hi,
It seems to build OK now on kfreebsd-i386 after this commit fixed the
bui
Hello:
I have updated the [0] version of the package yet again, now in sync with
latest upstream version.
I would greatly appreciate if you could test the build again. I don't have
access to a kfreebsd machine and hence I'm unable to test this on time before
the freeze.
Please, don't
c:457:6: error: 'struct usb_ctl_request' has no member named 'request'
../bsd.c:458:6: error: 'struct usb_ctl_request' has no member named 'request'
../bsd.c:459:3: error: 'struct usb_ctl_request' has no member named 'request'
../bsd.
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
As you requested
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d7dbd81.0b0cb5.02...@m132-177.yeah.net
ave indeed fixed the
problem? Then I'll request an upload.
(I'm not on this list, so please keep me cc'ed).
The easiest way is using git-buildpackage:
apt-get install git-buildpackage puredata debhelper quilt
git clone \
https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/pkg-multimedia/p
On 10/12/10 16:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I'm trying to fix bugs 605821-605830 in my packages, and since I am not
> a DD or DM, I don't have access to the Debian build machines. Could
> someone please try a test build to see if I have indeed fixed the
> problem?
I'm trying to fix bugs 605821-605830 in my packages, and since I am not
a DD or DM, I don't have access to the Debian build machines. Could
someone please try a test build to see if I have indeed fixed the
problem? Then I'll request an upload.
(I'm not on this list, so
Hi!
This is a short guide on how to build webcamd and a request for help.
webcamd is a port of Linux v4l drivers as a system daemon.
I'm tryng to get it working so that I can migrate my desktop someday.
Webcam support is mandatory or my sister will be upset ;-)
Here are my step
Hi!
This is a short guide on how to build webcamd and a request for help.
webcamd is a port of Linux v4l drivers as a system daemon. I'm tryng to get it
working so that I can migrate my desktop someday. Webcam support is mandatory
or my sister will be upset ;-)
Here are my steps:
1. In
Hi,
I guess this is best handled by the kfreebsd team.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hal
Version: 0.5.14-1
Severity: normal
After installing hal on a kfreebsd port of Debian on a kvm p
Hi,
> And fixed ;-)
In time before big-endians appear. :))
> > - Is kernel module atapicam enabled by default ?
> Bundled in,
Good decision.
> attached is whole config.
I will have to learn reading it.
> > - Are ACL enabled for individual filesystems by
> To be honest, we have deeper probl
Hi,
Petr Salinger wrote:
> Please note that
> libisofs/builder.c:209: warning: passing
> argument 2 of 'aaip_cleanout_st_mode' from
> incompatible pointer type
> is not problem in your code. Your code only detected
> problem in our code ;-)
I understand the warning is harmless for little
endia
I have tried to react on the warnings of buildd
on kfreebsd. The release is planned to come soon.
Please note that
libisofs/builder.c:209: warning: passing
argument 2 of 'aaip_cleanout_st_mode' from
incompatible pointer type
is not problem in your code. Your code only detected
problem in ou
Hi,
me:
> > None of the optional libraries and system
> > features is used in the buildd compile runs:
> > - libacl
> > - support for Extended Attributes
> > - zlib
> > Nevertheless, the aspects of ACL and xattr are
> > also porting issues.
Guillem Jover:
> This is a general packaging bug, there'
Hi!
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 19:46:36 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> None of the optional libraries and system
> features is used in the buildd compile runs:
> - libacl
> - support for Extended Attributes
> - zlib
>
> At least on Linux this astonishes me. I'll have
> to ask George for exploring the
That looks fine given that the kernel syscall is using 16 bits. For big
endian targets, given we have none of them, it should not be a problem,
they can use the same definition.
Committed in glibc-bsd SVN.
I will also add to pkg-glibc SVN, just after testsuite finishes.
It's a pitty we have su
Petr Salinger a écrit :
>> libisofs/builder.c:209: warning: passing
>> argument 2 of 'aaip_cleanout_st_mode' from
>> incompatible pointer type
>>
>> Is stat.st_mode not of type mode_t ?
>>
>> The line in question is:
>>
>> aaip_cleanout_st_mode(a_text, &(info.st_mode), 4 | 16);
>>
>> Argument n
Petr Salinger (04/01/2010):
> Aurelien, Cyril do you agree with this (eglibc) change?
I'm really not the person to talk to about those kind of things. But
speaking of eglibc, I guess you already know about the build failures
we're facing with the latest upload (2.10.2-3)?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature
libisofs/builder.c:209: warning: passing
argument 2 of 'aaip_cleanout_st_mode' from
incompatible pointer type
Is stat.st_mode not of type mode_t ?
The line in question is:
aaip_cleanout_st_mode(a_text, &(info.st_mode), 4 | 16);
Argument number two is a component of
struct stat info;
The
Hi,
Sorry for sending the same old mail again.
It should have been this one:
I had a look at the buildd logs of our libisofs
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=libisofs;ver=0.6.24-1;arch=kfreebsd-amd64;stamp=1255540287
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=libisofs;ver=0.6.24-1;arc
Hi,
looking over the system dependencies in our
project i come to the xorriso mount helper.
It reads the table-of-content of multi-session
media or files and produces a mount command
for mounting a particular session.
Typically used to retrieve older states from
multi-session backups.
I read fro
I read from the porting instructions that i
shall assume userland to be like Linux.
Well, the kernel is the same as in FreeBSD,
the libc is the same as in libc.
Majority of userland is the same as Linux,
but see bellow.
But this line is a bit obscure to me:
Example of uname check: Linux|GNU|
Hi,
looking over the system dependencies in our
project i come to the xorriso mount helper.
It reads the table-of-content of multi-session
media or files and produces a mount command
for mounting a particular session.
Typically used to retrieve older states from
multi-session backups.
I read fro
Hi, Aurel.
OK, I bit the bullet and now I am subscribed. :-)
You guys seem to be quite receptive to a newbie to a new platform and
this seems to be a great place for development.
On Sep 03 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:46:31PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Yes, hal *
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:46:31PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Hi once again, people.
>
> On Sep 02 2009, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > I have the suspicion that hal is the culprit
>
> Yes, hal *is* the culprit.
>
QEMU is actually the culprit. These messages do not appear on real
machines.
--
Au
Hi once again, people.
On Sep 02 2009, Rogério Brito wrote:
> I have the suspicion that hal is the culprit
Yes, hal *is* the culprit.
Disabling it completely with update-rc.d makes the system boot
beautifully without any problems (but, then, you have to tweak the
xorg.conf file, if you wish to h
Hi.
This is the second time that I got a problem with the i386 system when
installing in a qemu virtual machine (this time, I'm using kqemu, as I
hinted at a previous messge).
The attached dmesg is what I'm getting. :-(
The funny thing is that when I did not upgrade things, everything was
workin
[sorry for the double email, I forgot to cc the list]
On 28/11/2008, Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> Could you please consider enablig the "ae" driver in the next build of
>> the FreeBSD 7.1 kernel?
>>
>> If you can't enable it, can you please suggest me the easier way to
>> c
Hi.
Could you please consider enablig the "ae" driver in the next build of
the FreeBSD 7.1 kernel?
If you can't enable it, can you please suggest me the easier way to
compile the "ae" driver on Debian GNU/KfreeBSD?
It is (will be) not available as built-in, but is is (will be) available
as a
Hi.
I saw at [debian_svn] that in Debian svn you are targeting releng_7_1.
I saw that the "ae" driver is not enabled for releng_7_1
([releng_7_1_conf]), but it is enabled for head ([head_conf]).
The "ae" driver is useful to provide LAN to Asus Eee PC 900, as
described at [freebsd_wiki].
Could
Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:28:59PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
Hi.
I just wrote dirty hack for net-snmp, committed in SVN.
Nice work. This was a though one.
Please could someone built it and upload for both kfreebsd-i386 and
kfreebsd-amd64.
Uploaded to i386 (I don't
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:28:59PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I just wrote dirty hack for net-snmp, committed in SVN.
Nice work. This was a though one.
> Please could someone built it and upload for both kfreebsd-i386 and
> kfreebsd-amd64.
Uploaded to i386 (I don't have amd64 at ha
Hi.
I just wrote dirty hack for net-snmp, committed in SVN.
Please could someone built it and upload for both kfreebsd-i386 and
kfreebsd-amd64.
Following packages Build-depends on libsnmp9-dev:
php4
php5
apcupsd
cacti-cactid
cheops
cpqarrayd
cyrus-imapd-2.2
cyrus21-imapd
fwbuilder
gk
Would anyone from the debian bsd project be interested
in doing an interview for a BSD related podcast? You
can find the podcast at http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com.
-- Will Backman
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protect
This pre-recorded message is being sent in response to your recent
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All routine administrative requests (including subscriptions and
unsubscriptions) concerning this mailing list are handled by an
automated server. Please read this message carefully to find the
informati
Hi, I belong to a family of twelve adults and
several children. We have anything we need and more. I am writting this email to
find a way to give away our more to people. Before I arrived to this house they
used to thow almost new cloth into the garbage because they "did not want it" or
"did
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
> Please help me move scsh from woody/main to woody/non-free by
> rebuilding it for all 32 bit released architectures (don't try on 64
> bit architectures, it won't work). I can't do it because I am not a
> Debian Developer, hen
Hi,
Please help me move scsh from woody/main to woody/non-free by
rebuilding it for all 32 bit released architectures (don't try on 64
bit architectures, it won't work). I can't do it because I am not a
Debian Developer, hence I don't have access to the Debian machines.
Ready-to-build package at
. Our target is to raise the number of the
athletes training in Special Olympics Kazakhstan to 15 000 by the year
2005. Next year we are planning to recruit 3 500 new athletes.
Request for donation
kids sport uniform for age from 5-17, footwear (sinkers,),sports ware (t-
shirts, sport suits, shorts
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:22:36AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> So. I propose the following, and, barring objections over the next week
> or so, I'll take steps to update what I can to reflect this:
>
> uname -s will remain 'NetBSD'.
>
> uname -v will continue to have distinguishing features (I
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:21:09AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> Which works great, if it's libc-dev that's needed. It fails fairly
> severely, if a specific version of a library is needed due to, say, a fix
> in an included library that also requires a fix in the application.
>
> Not to mention p
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:28:03PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:46:05PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > >
> > > Untill we resolve this, please take into consideration to avoid filing
> > > patches
> > > that use "netbsd-i386" in a way that breaks the other port. I've been
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:46:05PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> >
> > Untill we resolve this, please take into consideration to avoid filing
> > patches
> > that use "netbsd-i386" in a way that breaks the other port. I've been
> > careful
> > to keep such incompatible patches without submitting, s
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 02:04:20AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:22:36AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > Indeed. As long as it's documented, people are probably going to be
> > hand-selecting their APT entries, anyway, so it isn't such a big deal.
> >
> > [...]
> > The Debi
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:22:36AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> Indeed. As long as it's documented, people are probably going to be
> hand-selecting their APT entries, anyway, so it isn't such a big deal.
>
> [...]
> The Debian architecture will remain 'netbsd-i386', with the known issue
> that we'l
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> There are very important technical reasons for these decisions, not only
> "nomenclature correctness" stuff. Let me explain.
>
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:33:22AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > uname -s: GNU/KFree
There are very important technical reasons for these decisions, not only
"nomenclature correctness" stuff. Let me explain.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:33:22AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > uname -s: GNU/KFreeBSD
> Uhm. I'd have to turn on my box to
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
> general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for
> the port than "Debian GNU/NetBSD", both because it is more specific about
> what's
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:41:00AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
> > general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for
>
Hi Joel,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
> general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for
> the port than "Debian GNU/NetBSD", both because it is more specific about
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:49:42PM +0100, Michael Ritzert wrote:
> Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.12.03 21:51:20:
> >
> > I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
> > general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for
> > the
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.12.03 21:51:20:
>
> I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
> general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for
> the port than "Debian GNU/NetBSD", both because it is more specific about
If t
I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for
the port than "Debian GNU/NetBSD", both because it is more specific about
what's going on, and because it doesn't dilute the NetBSD trademark. While
This user requested to be removed from your list.
They have been automatically removed from the system.
Please also make sure to remove:
debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
from all offline or backup lists you may maintain.
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:45:40PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
>
>1) __cxa_atexit - This can be worked around (GCC is patched to avoid
>using it), but it's fugly and really should be fixed. Conveniently, in
>-current, it is (after a PR requesting it). Can be backported, though I'm
>
1) __cxa_atexit - This can be worked around (GCC is patched to avoid
using it), but it's fugly and really should be fixed. Conveniently, in
-current, it is (after a PR requesting it). Can be backported, though I'm
not entirely sure I'm comfortable with that, given how it affects eve
So. I've been building stuff based on 1.6(.1) for a while now, since it
was the stable release. All well and good. However, recently I've
started to run into a fairly serious set of problems (3 of them, total),
of which only 2 can be backported.
1) __cxa_atexit - This can be worked around (GCC is
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:00:03AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:43:26PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > You're getting this mail because *BSD doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0.
> > As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some
> > time now, which
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:43:26PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> You're getting this mail because *BSD doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0.
> As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some
> time now, which are soon to become the official packages (an
> xfree86
Hi guys!
You're getting this mail because *BSD doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0.
As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some
time now, which are soon to become the official packages (an
xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v1 source package from the XSF is expected soonish).
Unfortun
A
preliminary inspection indicates that most of the required pieces fall
under the old BSD license, with a few under the revised BSD license or
the GNU GPL. The majority of these have copyrights by either UCB or The
NetBSD Foundation, Inc. (TNF)
If the copyright is
[ Please note: this message is sent as an interested party who is working ]
[ on the Debian GNU/NetBSD project; I am in no way speaking on behalf of ]
[ Debian in any official capacity.]
Recently I came across a possible licensing conflict on one of the Deb
stem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp.debian.org: New architecture request
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:13:33 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-14
Severity: normal
Please add the architecture freebsd-i386 t
l for many busy people.
- Brian
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 10:04:53AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Could you please direct this request to the proper party or department? We
> would like to get some additional information about your business in an
> effort
Hello,
Could you please direct this request to the proper party or department? We
would like to get some additional information about your business in an effort
to explore the ways that we might be able to work together. If possible, we
would like to receive your media package. If you have an
79 matches
Mail list logo
