Re: Reassurance

On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 04:57:52PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > Hopefully, the Debian sources are updated. > > A quick look at http://www.debian.org/security/2002/ does not indicate > sendmail/smrsh or groff/pic. We fixed the groff/pic hole roughly forever ago - I'm not sure why it took NetBSD

Re: Reassurance

On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 04:57:52PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Joel Baker wrote: > > > Most of them are in userland which is already provided by Debian in other > > packages, and as such, I do not build them from NetBSD sources. > > Hopefully, the Debian sources are update

Re: Reassurance

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Joel Baker wrote: > Most of them are in userland which is already provided by Debian in other > packages, and as such, I do not build them from NetBSD sources. Hopefully, the Debian sources are updated. A quick look at http://www.debian.org/security/2002/ does not indicate s

Reassurance

Anyone who is using my packages does not need to be concerned about the recent spate of NetBSD security announcements (all of those issued since version 1.6 was released); none of them have affected code that is in use by any of the packages I have built. Most of them are in userland which is alre