On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 14:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> 2011/9/22 Arno Töll :
>> > To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug
>> > fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u
>> > (#637020):
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:03:30PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Philipp Kern a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >> so parted FTBFSes on kfreebsd due to configure not knowing about it
> >> (#575007). Is there progress on this? (As it will block testing
Philipp Kern a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> so parted FTBFSes on kfreebsd due to configure not knowing about it
>> (#575007). Is there progress on this? (As it will block testing
>> migration due to kfreebsd issues being RC if the package has built
>>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> so parted FTBFSes on kfreebsd due to configure not knowing about it
> (#575007). Is there progress on this? (As it will block testing
> migration due to kfreebsd issues being RC if the package has built
> successfully before.)
I was
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:59:03AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Aurelien's segfault fix [1] seemed quite obvious, so I submitted it to
> > BTS, bug #559645 (btw, is severity appropiate? I don't know if GNU/kFreeBSD
> > bugs are considered RC these days...).
>
> Does it really segfault on your
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 02:03:57AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> So... I set myself to test my GPT patch for Parted, and end up reviewing the
> whole Parted situation. Here's a status update:
>
> GPT support fixed/tested, see #548436. Still doesn't fix support for big
> disks, though (see #55
severity 559645 grave
thanks
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 02:22:05AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Aurelien's segfault fix [1] seemed quite obvious, so I submitted it
> > to BTS, bug #559645 (btw, is severity appropiate? I don't know if
> > GNU/kFreeBSD bugs are considered RC these days...).
>
>
Robert Millan (06/12/2009):
> So... I set myself to test my GPT patch for Parted, and end up
> reviewing the whole Parted situation. Here's a status update:
Thanks for that.
> Aurelien's segfault fix [1] seemed quite obvious, so I submitted it
> to BTS, bug #559645 (btw, is severity appropiate?
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:14:27AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:14:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:08:26PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > I'm sorry. Please feel free to disable the patch; I'm thinking it was
> > > not a
> > > good idea t
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:26:29AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:48:35AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:14:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:08:26PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm sorry. Please fee
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:48:35AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:14:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:08:26PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm sorry. Please feel free to disable the patch; I'm thinking it was
> > > not a
> > > goo
11 matches
Mail list logo
