tags 649038 + patch
thanks
Hi,
After applying the fix for #615507, the remaining test failure I see is:
> FAIL: run-native-test.sh
>
>
> allregs: cannot attach to process: Function not implemented
which is an expected consequence of Bug #570805 (and is not necessarily
On 13/11/2013 10:48, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> And ELFOSABI_LINUX describe ELF files which do use
> such GNU extensions. What is the convention on Debian/kfreebsd?
Well, we used to provide these features before ELFOSABI_LINUX became a
requirement for having them. Now we can't provide them anymore (si
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 23:31 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 11/11/2013 15:32, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 00:45 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> Nothing as far as ELF compliance is concerned. This tag is ment to be
> >> consumed by the kernel ELF loader only.
> >
> > For elfuti
On 11/11/2013 15:32, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 00:45 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>> ELFOSABI_FREEBSD indicates this
>> binary has been built to run on kFreeBSD and uses its kernel ABI.
>>
>> If a binary is set to ELFOSABI_LINUX, then the kernel will enable Linux
>> emulation mode
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:32:09PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > >> - The other failures look like issues with the /proc interface
> > >> on the install. Does the /proc interface follow the Linux kernel
> > >> /proc interface that some of the tests rely on?
> >
> > Yes. But as there's
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 00:45 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> ELFOSABI_FREEBSD indicates this
> binary has been built to run on kFreeBSD and uses its kernel ABI.
>
> If a binary is set to ELFOSABI_LINUX, then the kernel will enable Linux
> emulation mode, i.e. Linux syscall interface.
Aha. Interestin
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:50:06PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > On 10/11/13 22:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >> > FAIL: run-native-test.sh
> >> > FAIL: dwfl-bug-fd-leak
>
> On 10/11/13 23:17, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > Was that with sbuild or similar chroot environment? These look like the
> On 10/11/13 22:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> > FAIL: run-native-test.sh
>> > FAIL: dwfl-bug-fd-leak
On 10/11/13 23:17, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Was that with sbuild or similar chroot environment? These look like the
> original issue from bug #649038.
Could I please check this; you saw those fa
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:30:16AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2013-11-10):
> > We could work around that by a porter building it outside of sbuild
> > and doing a binNMU. It's not a permanent solution, but it would at
> > least allow elfutils' other RC bug fixes to migrat
Steven Chamberlain (2013-11-10):
> We could work around that by a porter building it outside of sbuild
> and doing a binNMU. It's not a permanent solution, but it would at
> least allow elfutils' other RC bug fixes to migrate meanwhile.
As a mere spectator, it looks like porter uploads happened
On 10/11/13 22:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Anyway, with that patch applied I end up with:
>
> FAIL: run-native-test.sh
>
>
> /home/kroeckx/elfutils-0.157/tests/allregs:
> dwfl_module_register_names: Callback returned failure
>
> FAIL: dwfl-bug-fd-leak
>
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:12:38PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> On 20:07, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > > FAIL: run-disasm-x86.sh
> > > ===
> > >
> > > In file included from :0:0:
> > > /usr/include/stdc-predef.h:30:26: fatal error: bits/pred
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 20:07, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > FAIL: run-disasm-x86.sh
> > ===
> >
> > In file included from :0:0:
> > /usr/include/stdc-predef.h:30:26: fatal error: bits/predefs.h: No such file
> > or directory
> > #include
> > ^
Please consider outputting the contents of tests/test-suite.log so that
it appears in the build log. Here are examples of how some other
packages have done this:
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=cat.*test.*suite\.log
The new failure is related to a libc0.1 header:
> FAIL: run-disasm-x86.sh
On 10/11/2013 00:18, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> - elflint doesn't know about the OS ABI "FreeBSD".
>> - Is this correct in the ELF files?
Yes.
>> I don't know whether
>> kfreebsd is supposed to follow the user space ELF OS ABI
>> or the kernel one.
I'm not sure what you
Currently I see some different testsuite failures than before. This was
in a sid chroot on kfreebsd-amd64 (not using bind mounts) :
run-native-test.sh passes for me.
> FAIL: run-disasm-x86.sh
that failure is new.
> ../config/test-driver: line 95: 44771 Segmentation fault "$@" >
> $log_fi
Hi,
debian-bsd@ was not put in Cc: for this bug, so the recent discussion
was probably not seen yet by people who can answer:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:02:18 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> - Would it help to just disable the testsuite on the kfreebsd arch?
> Clearly the package
17 matches
Mail list logo
