Re: Bug#636668: kfreebsd-amd64: various failures

2011-08-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 02:54:20PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >Steve McIntyre, le Fri 05 Aug 2011 13:43:32 +0100, a écrit : >> >So a proper-enough fix would be to make sure that zfsutils are on the >> >netinst CD which, AIUI, is supposed to contain enough packages to >> >install a working base s

Re: Bug#636668: kfreebsd-amd64: various failures

2011-08-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Steve McIntyre, le Fri 05 Aug 2011 13:43:32 +0100, a écrit : > >So a proper-enough fix would be to make sure that zfsutils are on the > >netinst CD which, AIUI, is supposed to contain enough packages to > >install a working base system. debian-cd maintainers, do you agree? > > Sure, makes sense. C

Re: Bug#636668: kfreebsd-amd64: various failures

2011-08-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 02:09:38PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >Samuel Thibault, le Fri 05 Aug 2011 02:14:01 +0200, a écrit : >> - The boot loader step failed at first. console 4 was complaining that >> /boot/zfs wasn't existing. >> - However, /usr and /var were not mounted. > >Actually, these

Re: Bug#636668: kfreebsd-amd64: various failures

2011-08-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Fri 05 Aug 2011 02:14:01 +0200, a écrit : > - The boot loader step failed at first. console 4 was complaining that > /boot/zfs wasn't existing. > - However, /usr and /var were not mounted. Actually, these two are probably simply a consequence of this > - The zfsutils package