On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:39:09AM +, Jonathan Amery wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >EVentually yes, but it may well be that we no longer need this system
> >by the time we are stable enough for a formal autobuilder. I'm
> >certainly willing to build packages from this tr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>EVentually yes, but it may well be that we no longer need this system
>by the time we are stable enough for a formal autobuilder. I'm
>certainly willing to build packages from this tree and make them
>appear in MIT AFS space, which is web accessible.
>
I
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 04:17:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:36:01PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > > "utsl" == utsl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > utsl> This is a good idea. I'm interested in it. Why not simply
> > utsl> import the standard Deb
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:36:01PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "utsl" == utsl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> utsl> This is a good idea. I'm interested in it. Why not simply
> utsl> import the standard Debian source packages as vendor
> utsl> branches, and use the normal CVS fa
> "utsl" == utsl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
utsl> This is a good idea. I'm interested in it. Why not simply
utsl> import the standard Debian source packages as vendor
utsl> branches, and use the normal CVS facilities to track the
utsl> changes? This seems simpler than keepin
This is a good idea. I'm interested in it.
Why not simply import the standard Debian source packages as vendor branches,
and use the normal CVS facilities to track the changes? This seems simpler than
keeping patches in separate files, as you describe below. Also, it should work
with cvsbuildpacka
> "Joel" == Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joel> I'll worry about this when it doesn't require a chroot
Joel> tarball just to get things up and running. Until then... the
Joel> only folks who're likely to be even remotely interested in
Joel> debugging are the diehards,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:15:46PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
>
> As I mentioned Saturday, I'm interested in helping set up some sort of
> system for managing patches that we are not comfortable sending back
> to Debian packages yet.
>
> I'm concerned that without such a system:
>
> * Differen
As I mentioned Saturday, I'm interested in helping set up some sort of
system for managing patches that we are not comfortable sending back
to Debian packages yet.
I'm concerned that without such a system:
* Different people will each set up their own archives of packages
with different mecha
9 matches
Mail list logo
