On 04/06/12 17:38, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Could have worked with a dep-wait anyway. However everything mentioned
> above should now be building, let's wait for results.
Oh, I'll try to remember that for next time we have anything like this.
Some of these failed, but for different reasons than b
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> On 04/06/12 07:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> Done for kfreebsd-i386.
>> And now done for kfreebsd-amd64.
>
> Thankyou for that. They're both built+installed. I assume that means
> they're available to all buildds even before the next dinstall run?
Buildds are access
On 04/06/12 07:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Done for kfreebsd-i386.
> And now done for kfreebsd-amd64.
Thankyou for that. They're both built+installed. I assume that means
they're available to all buildds even before the next dinstall run?
So could we now please have givebacks on kfreebsd-* of:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:54:16AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:59:28AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > eglibc 2.13-33 has been uploaded and built; please could you upgrade
> > the buildds to use this as soon as possible and then give back r
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:59:28AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> eglibc 2.13-33 has been uploaded and built; please could you upgrade
> the buildds to use this as soon as possible and then give back ruby1.8.
Done for kfreebsd-i386.
--
Aurelien Jarno
Hi Christoph,
eglibc 2.13-33 has been uploaded and built; please could you upgrade
the buildds to use this as soon as possible and then give back ruby1.8.
As KiBi points out there are a lot of migrations waiting on this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674942#52
Thanks a lot,
6 matches
Mail list logo
