On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 07:16:14PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> > > Now, when logs from SVN are elsewhere,
> > > I second Aurelien's "switch everything to debian-bsd"
> > > (http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2006/02/msg00114.html).
> >
> > Then we supress glibc-bsd-devel ?
>
> Yes, hibernat
Petr Salinger a écrit :
Now, when logs from SVN are elsewhere,
I second Aurelien's "switch everything to debian-bsd"
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2006/02/msg00114.html).
Then we supress glibc-bsd-devel ?
Yes, hibernate glibc-bsd-devel.
Or maybe we want to keep it for development
> > Now, when logs from SVN are elsewhere,
> > I second Aurelien's "switch everything to debian-bsd"
> > (http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2006/02/msg00114.html).
>
> Then we supress glibc-bsd-devel ?
Yes, hibernate glibc-bsd-devel.
> Or maybe we want to keep it for development issues?
>
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:33:02AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> > Then I don't really what to do with the mailing lists. I think we should
> > keep in mind:
> >
> > 1) mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are delivered to all ports mailing
> >list, including [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 2) the address used fo
> Then I don't really what to do with the mailing lists. I think we should
> keep in mind:
>
> 1) mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are delivered to all ports mailing
>list, including [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2) the address used for the maintainer field in the packages is
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] It could b
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 04:17:44PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > BTW, what to do with mailing lists usage
> > (http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2006/02/msg00113.html)
> > Swap them, leave it as is ?
>
> Aurelien said (via IRC) he'd move the logs to a separate list this weekend.
>
Done, the ne
6 matches
Mail list logo
