Re: NetBSD packages

2001-07-08 Thread Wartan Hachaturow
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 05:17:39PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Without having looked at the source, I had. > I think it's likely that it's pretty dependent on the Linux kernel It is. > so we probably need to package the analagous > BSD tools. For sure :) -- Regards, Wartan. "Computer

Re: NetBSD packages

2001-07-08 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:32:57PM +1000, matthew green wrote: > wow. i'm very impressed. Thanks :) > console-tools/data (probably needs to be replaced by BSD analogues) > > > which are these? i'm not actually very familiar with debian. Config

re: NetBSD packages

2001-07-08 Thread matthew green
> libstdc++ (NetBSD version) I agree with the remark about GCC-3.0 here... you will have issues using this compiler with some/most NetBSD ports. i would strongly suggest using what we have as `src/gnu/dist/toolchain', which is gcc 2.95.3 / binutils 2.11 based, and mostly works on m

Re: NetBSD packages

2001-07-08 Thread Wartan Hachaturow
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 12:35:00AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > sysvinit (need to decide what we're doing with this one - use BSD init and Ok, I'll have a look of what could be done with that one. Man, you're getting me to install NetBSD ;-) -- Regards, Wartan. "Computers are not intellige

Re: NetBSD packages

2001-07-08 Thread Michael Goetze
> e2fsprogs (need to build an analogous ufsprogs package - does it need > to provide: e2fsprogs?) I think it would be best to make a virtual package called something like rootfsprogs. Then your dependencies could look like: xxx depends on rootfsprogs e2fsprogs provides rootfsprogs ufsprogs provid

Re: NetBSD packages

2001-07-08 Thread matthew green
wow. i'm very impressed. apt (should be trivial, I just haven't got round to it yet due to nothing else depending on it) i'm very interested in this. console-tools/data (probably needs to be replaced

Re: NetBSD packages

2001-07-07 Thread Nathan Myers
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 12:35:00AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > I've succesfully built libncurses packages using a combination of the > source from the BSD ports tree and the Debian build scripts. Great work! > apt (should be trivial, I just haven't got round to it yet due to nothing > el

NetBSD packages

2001-07-07 Thread Matthew Garrett
I've succesfully built libncurses packages using a combination of the source from the BSD ports tree and the Debian build scripts. I'm guessing that one of the alterations made to the build scripts by the Debian patches was what was causing me pain - I'll look into it more closely when I get ba