Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:12:19 +0100
with message-id <52dd3cd3.8050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691346: mfi in 9.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #691346,
regarding kfreebsd-amd64 fails to install on LSI MegaRAID SAS 2208
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:12:19 +0100
with message-id <52dd3cd3.8050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691346: mfi in 9.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #691346,
regarding kfreebsd-amd64 fails to install on LSI MegaRAID SAS 2208
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi!
> Considering this seems to affect a very limited number of hardware I
> don't think it actually classifies as critical for kfreebsd after
> all.
I don't know how many SystemX servers IBM has sold in the last 6
months, but most of them mount this or other LSI cards ba
Hi,
On 31/10/12 19:51, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Do we know whether 9.1 will be fine for backports (Can we update the
> kernel keeping freebsd-utils and family at the same version)? 9.1 kernel
> would be nice for some features including intel drm.
Last time I tried, 9.1 (I think it was up to RC1 a
Actually this is the more relevant changelog; it can be seen that 9.1
will definitely have the new driver from LSI:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1/sys/dev/mps/mps.c?view=log
Also I'm not completely sure the mps(4) driver can be backported to
kFreeBSD 9.0. I think getting kFreeBSD 9.1
I wonder why the kernel output mentions "mpt0:" rather than "mpslsi0:";
it should be using the mps(4) driver for this card:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=mps
Anyway the man page says this driver was still in development. Even if
some small fix exists for this particular issue at boot
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #691754 [kfreebsd-9] kfreebsd-amd64 fails to install on LSI MegaRAID SAS
2208
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
--
691754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691754
Debian Bug Tra
Control: severity -1 important
Hi!
Considering this seems to affect a very limited number of hardware I
don't think it actually classifies as critical for kfreebsd after
all. Nonetheless it might be good to fix the problem -- if
possible. Unfortunately the linked documentation does not give any
8 matches
Mail list logo
