Hi,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:20:21PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> FYI I've had slightly more luck building this locally on kfreebsd-amd64
> with openjdk-7. I built with -j1 (to keep memory requirements low) in a
debian/rules already sets -j1 for the tests explicitely, just the
build is p
Hi Rene,
On 19/06/13 10:57, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [...] fail
> on the kfreebsd-amd64 porterbox as it did on the buildd (yes, I tried
> actually I saw that failure mode *before* I uploaded and hoped it would
> be just a local problem [...]
FYI I've had slightly more luck building this locally on
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:41:18AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> There are some curious mentions of gcj also in the failed build log.
Which are totally irrelevant for the thing here. You should trust the
person who fought with this crap since 11 years.
> > basename: missing operand
> > Try `
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:58:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Are you sure those problems are not caused precisely because of gcj?
I wouldn't rule anything out yet... If Python is used as part of the
build system it could even be something to do with that (we still have
random thread-relate
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:58:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2013/6/18 Rene Engelhard :
> > I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently:
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1%3A4.1.0~beta2-1&stamp=1370824274
>
> Are
2013/6/18 Rene Engelhard :
> I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1%3A4.1.0~beta2-1&stamp=1370824274
Are you sure those problems are not caused precisely because of gcj?
In the b
On 18/06/13 11:47, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1%3A4.1.0~beta2-1&stamp=1370824274
Oh sorry, did not know about that. We don't want to change thi
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:19:13AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Please could kfreebsd-amd64 be added to the list of openjdk-7 arches on
> the next upload of java-common? (patch attached)
I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently:
https://buildd.debian.org/s
Hi Java maintainers,
Please could kfreebsd-amd64 be added to the list of openjdk-7 arches on
the next upload of java-common? (patch attached)
kfreebsd-i386 may follow in the future but it is not ready yet.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--- java-common/debian/rules (
9 matches
Mail list logo
