Re: HAL and *BSD

2013-06-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 10 Jun 2013 23:20:54 +0100, a écrit : > On 05/06/13 02:08, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Afaics, there are basically 3 options: > > > > 1/ We drop hal and Xorg is ported to something like devd on *BSD > > > > 2/ We drop hal and hal support is simply disabled on non-Linux, wh

Re: HAL and *BSD

2013-06-10 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On 05/06/13 02:08, Michael Biebl wrote: > Afaics, there are basically 3 options: > > 1/ We drop hal and Xorg is ported to something like devd on *BSD > > 2/ We drop hal and hal support is simply disabled on non-Linux, which > means, Xorg needs to be configured manually? Maybe Julien or KiBi

Re: HAL and *BSD

2013-06-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
If you want to contact X maintainers, please use the maintainer address, which is the debian-x@ list… Quoting the full mail below accordingly. KiBi. Michael Biebl (05/06/2013): > Hi BSD porters, > > as you may know, hal hasn't seen any upstream development for years and > is dead. For that matt

HAL and *BSD

2013-06-04 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi BSD porters, as you may know, hal hasn't seen any upstream development for years and is dead. For that matter I've filed bug reports some time ago [1]. The only real blocker atm that I can see is Xorg using hal on kfreebsd. There has been some discussion about this topic over two years ago [2]