Re: Bug#705435: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 17:17 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le jeudi, 18 avril 2013 12.55:09, Steven Chamberlain a écrit : > > It would be really helpful if you are able to test again with pulseaudio > > (+ libpulse0) patched with: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=20;filena

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-19 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi all, Le jeudi, 18 avril 2013 12.55:09, Steven Chamberlain a écrit : > On 09/04/13 19:15, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > - gdm3 … doesn't finish loading. It fullscreen-says "Oops, an error > > occured". - lightdm + "Gnome": same. > > - lightdm + "Gnome classic": same. > > Many thanks for testi

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-18 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi OdyX, On 09/04/13 19:15, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > - gdm3 … doesn't finish loading. It fullscreen-says "Oops, an error occured". > - lightdm + "Gnome": same. > - lightdm + "Gnome classic": same. Many thanks for testing that. It would be really helpful if you are able to test again with pu

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 09/04/13 19:15, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > - gdm3 … doesn't finish loading. It fullscreen-says "Oops, an error occured". > - lightdm + "Gnome": same. > - lightdm + "Gnome classic": same. Found a workaround for this :) But it is strange... 1. Start the system without gdm3 (e.g. update-rc.d

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 09/04/13 19:15, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > I just did (in kvm/qemu) and the result isn't great (for Gnome): Thank you very much for testing. > - gdm3 … doesn't finish loading. It fullscreen-says "Oops, an error occured". Confirmed: gdm3 shows the 'fail whale' modal dialog; at least the c

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-10 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 06:29:23PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >Hi, > >On 09/04/13 13:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> 1. I thought both the addition of iw and network-manager-gnome as >> Depends or Recommends in tasksel was depending on that "arch: all" >> vs. "arch: any" discussion. >

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-09 Thread Michael Dorrington
On 09/04/13 19:15, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le mardi, 9 avril 2013 19.29:23, Steven Chamberlain a écrit : >> During wheezy development, GNOME 3 was so broken for us that xfce was >> chosen as a default for new installs. Multiple show-stopper issues got >> fixed during the freeze though. At t

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-09 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le mardi, 9 avril 2013 19.29:23, Steven Chamberlain a écrit : > During wheezy development, GNOME 3 was so broken for us that xfce was > chosen as a default for new installs. Multiple show-stopper issues got > fixed during the freeze though. At this point I believe it 'should > work' but so few pe

Re: Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD

2013-04-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On 09/04/13 13:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > 1. I thought both the addition of iw and network-manager-gnome as > Depends or Recommends in tasksel was depending on that "arch: all" > vs. "arch: any" discussion. As long as they are lowered to Recommends, it shouldn't matter any more if

Gnome installability vs. GNU/kFreeBSD (was: "tasksel arch any" vs. "keeping track of n-m in debian-cd"?)

2013-04-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (09/04/2013): > Then I think I'd rather ask you to keep doing so for wheezy's > lifetime, than trying to fiddle with tasksel at this very late point > of the freeze. To clarify as I did on IRC: 1. I thought both the addition of iw and network-manager-gnome as Depends or Recom