On 16/03/2014 17:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> feel free to switch to userland 10 whenever you feel
> it's ready, and to commit stuff in debian-installer's master branch.
Excellent, thanks. I'm a bit wary of doing that on sunday afternoon, so assuming
everyone's ok with that, I'll upload userland 1
On 10/03/2014 01:06, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> The new userland is working flawlessly for me.
Excellent! Thanks for testing.
> I believe it can go into sid whenever you are ready.
See:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2014/03/msg00069.html
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBS
On 22:42, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> >I'm also using xorg 1.15 from sid, with Robert's patch to use devd
> >instead of HAL.
>
> The patch already is in package or not yet?
Not yet; I rebuilt xorg-server/1.15 with the attached patch, installed
the new xserver-common and xserver-xorg-co
I'm also using xorg 1.15 from sid, with Robert's patch to use devd
instead of HAL.
The patch already is in package or not yet?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.d
On 22:16, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Em 2014-03-09 22:06, Steven Chamberlain escreveu:
> >The new userland is working flawlessly for me.
>
> userland? coreutils, binutils, libc, pkgng and ports? o.O
I meant just the new freebsd-libs and freebsd-utils from experimental:
# apt-get -o Dp
Hi Robert,
The new userland is working flawlessly for me.
I believe it can go into sid whenever you are ready.
Many thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
On 04/02/2014 22:19, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I notice a wheezy system has this wrapper, but /sbin/sysctl takes
> precendence over it?
They're both the same thing (symlinked).
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On 04/02/2014 22:07, Christoph Egger wrote:
> % sudo sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf
> sysctl: unknown oid '/etc/sysctl.conf': No such file or directory
Seems like the script was buggy. So I just replaced it:
freebsd-utils (10.0-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* Add 'sysctl -p' support. Replace /sbin/sy
On 04/02/14 21:50, Robert Millan wrote:
> Strange. Is /bin/sysctl the wrapper script? (which supports -p)
I notice a wheezy system has this wrapper, but /sbin/sysctl takes
precendence over it?
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste..
Robert Millan writes:
> On 04/02/2014 21:26, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Hi Robert!
>>
>> During update I'm seeing the following:
>>
>>> Setting up freebsd-utils (10.0-2) ...
>>>
>>> Configuration file '/etc/sysctl.conf'
>>> ==> File on system created by you or by a script.
>>> ==> File also in
On 04/02/2014 21:26, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi Robert!
>
> During update I'm seeing the following:
>
>> Setting up freebsd-utils (10.0-2) ...
>>
>> Configuration file '/etc/sysctl.conf'
>> ==> File on system created by you or by a script.
>> ==> File also in package provided by package mainta
Hi Robert!
During update I'm seeing the following:
> Setting up freebsd-utils (10.0-2) ...
>
> Configuration file '/etc/sysctl.conf'
> ==> File on system created by you or by a script.
> ==> File also in package provided by package maintainer.
>What would you like to do about it ? Your op
On 03/02/14 23:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2014-02-03):
>> * mkfs.ufs (which seemed broken yesterday in jessie d-i images with
>> 9.2 kernel?)
>
> Which image(s)?
Not sure; I'll set up a means for logging, reproduce it again and let
you know exactly which image I use.
I'v
On 03/02/2014 23:13, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 03/02/14 22:53, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Does anyone want to test this further before I upload it to sid?
>
> I would like to test but not sure how soon I can do this; some things
> on my list to check would be:
>
> * mkfs.ufs (which seemed brok
Steven Chamberlain (2014-02-03):
> * mkfs.ufs (which seemed broken yesterday in jessie d-i images with
> 9.2 kernel?)
Which image(s)?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 03/02/14 22:53, Robert Millan wrote:
> Does anyone want to test this further before I upload it to sid?
I would like to test but not sure how soon I can do this; some things
on my list to check would be:
* mkfs.ufs (which seemed broken yesterday in jessie d-i images with 9.2
kernel?)
* DHCP
*
I think FreeBSD 10 userland (freebsd-utils and freebsd-libs) might be ready for
uploading to unstable.
After today's freebsd-net-tools 10.0-2 upload, it no longer breaks network
access
in your system, which is a big improvement ;-)
Does anyone want to test this further before I upload
17 matches
Mail list logo
