Re: FTBFS libidn 1.20 on kfreebsd-amd64

2011-03-02 Thread Simon Josefsson
Cyril Brulebois writes: >> Thanks for the information. How do I reschedule the build? Please >> consider this a reschedule request, if such a thing is possible. :-) > > Done. Will try and give it back as needed. Thanks -- it seems we are unlucky and the build hits fasch every time. Please try

Re: FTBFS libidn 1.20 on kfreebsd-amd64

2011-03-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Simon Josefsson (01/03/2011): > Petr Salinger writes: > > I cannot help with it, as it does not fail neither on my machine. > > I do not know differences between fano and fash - CPU/memory/... if you can contact me (or $arch@buildd.d.o) I could be your proxy and help you get those info. >

Re: FTBFS libidn 1.20 on kfreebsd-amd64

2011-03-01 Thread Simon Josefsson
Petr Salinger writes: >> I suspect fixing this is out of libidn's domain, so I would appreciate >> help to debug and report it to the gcj people. Maybe this is a known >> problem? > > The state is known, gcj fails on fash but not on fano. > The cause of this problem is not known :-( > > I cannot

Re: FTBFS libidn 1.20 on kfreebsd-amd64

2011-03-01 Thread Petr Salinger
I suspect fixing this is out of libidn's domain, so I would appreciate help to debug and report it to the gcj people. Maybe this is a known problem? The state is known, gcj fails on fash but not on fano. The cause of this problem is not known :-( I cannot help with it, as it does not fail neit

FTBFS libidn 1.20 on kfreebsd-amd64

2011-03-01 Thread Simon Josefsson
Hi. I maintain libidn, and it triggers a gcj internal error on kfreebsd-amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=libidn;ver=1.20-1;arch=kfreebsd-amd64;stamp=1298995483 I suspect fixing this is out of libidn's domain, so I would appreciate help to debug and report it to the gcj people. May