On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
The release notes for 9.0-RELEASE [3] seems to imply that UFS+SUJ became
the default but I can't find evidence of the change happening in code.
Note that when combined with UFS snapshots, UFS+SUJ has some problems, and
on stable/9 after 9.0-rele
On 23/06/13 21:32, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> My biggest question is why upstream FreeBSD chose not to use this on the
> root filesystem if it was safe enough for the others. If it was, for
> example, a bootloader limitation it may not be relevant to us.
For that matter I suspect GRUB cannot saf
Hi,
In an old thread, the use of UFS soft updates was discussed:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2012/09/msg00011.html
I'm wondering if we could consider UFS+S, UFS+SUJ or UFS+J as a default
for new installs.
I've only tried UFS+S myself. On media that is slow to write metadata
changes, it e
3 matches
Mail list logo
