Package: ftp.debian.org
Dear FTP Masters,
For a while, openjdk-7 was the default JDK on kfreebsd-*. That allowed
eclipse-cdt to build. But this is no longer the case. Java packaging
policy doesn't allow to depend on a non-default Java.
Therefore, please could the out-of-date eclips
Em 2014-01-15 13:20, Robert Millan escreveu:
Hi Bruno,
On 12/01/2014 19:16, Bruno Maximo e Melo wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.8.0~rc4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I'm reporting this bug from Linux, the problem is: eclipse-cdt and
eclipse-jdt
Hi Bruno,
On 12/01/2014 19:16, Bruno Maximo e Melo wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.8.0~rc4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi,
> I'm reporting this bug from Linux, the problem is: eclipse-cdt and eclipse-jdt
> are installed
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.8.0~rc4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I'm reporting this bug from Linux, the problem is: eclipse-cdt and eclipse-jdt
are installed but Eclipse can't create C/C++ or Java projects.
I installed too the Pydev and same problem
On 15/12/2013 05:16, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Hi guys
> Look for the IDLE and Eclipse on kFreeBSD...
> IDLE almost freezes when I try to open a file, the edit window can't be
> closed and the name of the file isn't on top of window.
> Eclipse...well, I have
Hi guys
Look for the IDLE and Eclipse on kFreeBSD...
IDLE almost freezes when I try to open a file, the edit window can't be
closed and the name of the file isn't on top of window.
Eclipse...well, I have eclipse-cdt installed and I can't create any
project, including java project
Steven Chamberlain:
>> It fails to build with our default-jdk. On kfreebsd that is currently
>> gcj, which seems insufficient to build eclipse.
>>
>> So, eclipse could maybe change to a more specific build-depends if
>> that's appropriate, so that openjdk
he next build attempt for eclipse should be successful, and
some other packages too.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
I can't understand very well...the transitions is necessary or not?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1378505806.5602.1.camel@debian
On 06/09/13 21:55, Robert Millan wrote:
> The way I see it, as things stand now it makes a lot more sense to
> bypass default-jdk in order to get things working...
What do you mean by that? To tighten the build-dependencies of eclipse
and others, that can't build with gcj?
I think
On 06/09/2013 23:24, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 06/09/13 21:55, Robert Millan wrote:
>> The way I see it, as things stand now it makes a lot more sense to
>> bypass default-jdk in order to get things working...
> What do you mean by that? To tighten the build-dependencie
Melo wrote:
>> why eclipse is not in kfreebsd? it's the best ide, i think necessary...
>
> It fails to build with our default-jdk. On kfreebsd that is currently
> gcj, which seems insufficient to build eclipse.
>
> So, eclipse could maybe change to a more specific build-depen
Bruno Melo:
> why eclipse is not in kfreebsd? it's the best ide, i think necessary...
We can't build it until after the openjdk-7 transition, I'm afraid.
Speaking of which, what's the current status? AFAICT -release said it
doesn't require their explicit approval?
why eclipse is not in kfreebsd? it's the best ide, i think necessary...
Hi,
I just got Eclipse working on kfreebsd-amd64. It required a small change
plus switching the default Java implementation to openjdk-7.
I was about to send bug reports with these patches, but since I'm so
totally disconnected from the current state of things (Sorry about that.
Really) I&#
15 matches
Mail list logo
