Steven,
Thanks for your quick response and efforts. Crucially when I poke
around in /proc/self on asdfasdf.debian.net (or the Hurd
exodar.debian.net for that matter) I can find no /proc/sef/fd directory.
From what I understand that is crucial to a /proc-basd lsof.
Please feel free to check
Hi!
On 20/04/12 00:45, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
>> 8.6Why can't Configure create lsof_owner.h for FreeBSD 6 and above?
>> ... Lsof needs to access elements of that
>> lockf_owner structure to determine if a lock belongs to the
>> process that has a file open.
The goal really is to
tag 589103 +help
thanks
I have been looking at what it will take to build lsof on kfreebsd.
Obviously the first step is passing '-n freebsd' to './Configure' as noted
earlier on the bug report. You can see the current state of our work at
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/lsof.git
V
Hi all!
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Carlos Mario wrote:
> A few time i was knowing the Free software. Now i thinking install
> debian and freeBSD in my PC. But i have a question: if i want learn
> to admin the unix system, reallity is logic try to work at home with
> this 2 operative systems?wha
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Carlos Mario wrote:
> A few time i was knowing the Free software. Now i thinking install
> debian and freeBSD in my PC. But i have a question: if i want learn
> to admin the unix system, reallity is logic try to work at home with
> this 2 operative systems? what can i lear
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:04:03AM -0500, Carlos Mario wrote:
> Dear sirs:
Hi Carlos,
> A few time i was knowing the Free software. Now i thinking install debian
> and freeBSD in my PC. But i have a question: if i want learn to admin the
> unix
> system, reallity is logic try to work at hom
Dear sirs:
A few time i was knowing the Free software.
Now i thinking install debian and freeBSD in my PC. But i have a
question: if i want learn to admin the unixsystem, reallity is logic
try to work at home with this 2 operative systems? what can i
learn if i study this plataform
That's what it looked like in CVS. I briefly considered trying to port ldd from
NetBSD. They are implemented very differently. On NetBSD ldd does all the work,
while on Linux and FreeBSD, it is just a wrapper around ld.so. The difference
is that the ld.so on Linux has a workaround for shared librar
I'm using dpkg 1.9.16, which I believe was from unstable. I checked CVS, and it
looked like 1.9.16 had just been released when I got it. I'm using testing and
sid, for the most part. I had to downgrade a few things, like gcc and perl,
because I couldn't get the latest versions to compile. So for n
FWIW, it seems that the NetBSD ELF `ldd' works with shared libraries.
i don't have an a.out system to test with but you can probably ignore
that as most netbsd port have switched or are in the process of
switching to ELF.
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 01:51:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's what it looked like in CVS. I briefly considered trying to port ldd
> from
> NetBSD. They are implemented very differently. On NetBSD ldd does all the
> work,
> while on Linux and FreeBSD, it is just a wrapper around ld.s
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 09:43:47AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now if I could just figure out how to handle utmp... :-)
I had simply changed local utmp.h for everything to compile
cleanly. Most of the changes there belong to sysvinit, after all,
and libc could safely ignore them.
--
Regar
That's a good idea. I should subscribe to some of those lists, anyway. But now
that I have it working with ldconfig -r, I don't think it'll be necessary to
hack ldd.
Now if I could just figure out how to handle utmp... :-)
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 01:11:04PM -0500, Steve Price wrote:
> On Sat, Aug
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 12:38:12PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> Potato is a static release, no development is being done on it anymore, only
> security fixes.
... and major bug fixes in "proposed updates".
--
Regards, Wartan.
echo "Your stdio isn't very std."
-- Larry Wa
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 09:49:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The list has been quiet the last couple days, so I thought I'd post some
> updates from my adventures with FreeBSD:
> * Figured out how to "fix" dpkg-shlibdeps. It wanted to use ldd on shared
>libs, but I hacked it to get a
I'm aware FreeBSD has a different way to handle shadow passwords. The
difficulty is that update-passwd doesn't know that. It thinks it needs some
of those functions to work. Quite a few debian packages rely on
update-passwd to be able to add users and groups, so I'm probably going to
need to lo
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 09:49:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * shadow.h: FreeBSD doesn't seem to implement the standard shadow password
>functions in it's libc. (No getspnam and friends.) So far, I've learned
> that
>this breaks base-passwd.
shadow password stuff is handled by the
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 09:49:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The list has been quiet the last couple days, so I thought I'd post some
> updates from my adventures with FreeBSD:
...
>
> Bad news:
> * utmp: just about everything that compiles against utmp.h fails. Debian
>tools are ex
> * shadow.h: FreeBSD doesn't seem to implement the standard shadow password
>functions in it's libc. (No getspnam and friends.) So far, I've learned
that
>this breaks base-passwd.
note that 4.4BSD 'shadow' passwords exist in /etc/master.passwd. from this
file, /etc/passwd, /
> * shadow.h: FreeBSD doesn't seem to implement the standard shadow password
>functions in it's libc. (No getspnam and friends.) So far, I've learned
> that
>this breaks base-passwd.
That made me remember other differences to choose:
- BSD Login Classes / Capabilities vs. PAM-type capab
The list has been quiet the last couple days, so I thought I'd post some
updates from my adventures with FreeBSD:
Good news:
* I built my first package in the chroot. Bash was giving me problems with
libreadline, so I decided to try it in the chroot, and it worked. I had to
force install it
On Nov 20, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Don't forget about competition for archive space resources.
Agreed. ILS (linux.it) just bought a new disk for ftp.it.debian.org and
I see the distribution has grown nearly half GB in the last month.
I really would be upset if all linux/i386 will
On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 12:46:37PM +0100, Per Lundberg wrote:
> Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Of course that raises US issues so it's not going to happen, but it'd be
> > cool all the same.
>
> Well.. the libc could be in non-US.
With libc in non-US every program using libc wil
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Thursday 18 November 1999, at 16 h 59, the keyboard of Piotr Roszatycki
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We discussed two approaches on this list:
> - just using the FreeBSD kernel (and a few userland kernel-specific
> utilities), everything else would be normal Deb
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Personally if we're going to do a BSD and use their libc, I think we
> should be looking at OpenBSD rather than FreeBSD... , strong
> crypto in libc...
Nothing stops us from doing both, you know. Personally, I just happen
to prefer the FreeBSD kern
#x27;s DebianBSD or something.
>
> But DebianBSD is misleading, since it doesn't tell which BSD we're
> talking about. Debian/FreeBSD would be best, IMO, if the FreeBSD guys
> let us have that name.
Sure enough---but we have to ask first. Personally if we're going t
On Thursday 18 November 1999, at 16 h 59, the keyboard of Piotr Roszatycki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How is it different? You're thinking of the passwd.master (or what it's
> > called), or something else?
>
> FreeBSD-3.3 have master.passwd with additional fields befor GECOS field.
We discu
g.
But DebianBSD is misleading, since it doesn't tell which BSD we're
talking about. Debian/FreeBSD would be best, IMO, if the FreeBSD guys
let us have that name.
On Thursday 18 November 1999, at 22 h 6, the keyboard of John Goerzen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is no mere political thing as you try to make it. What you and
> others are trying to do is, in my opinion, seriously damaging to the
> Free Software community.
...
> WE MUST NOT ALLOW people
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 05:03:22PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> This is a very bad idea.
>
> Why? The BSD license.
>
> We must not help software based on a BSD-licensed kernel no less
> become more prevelant. The reason is that the BSD license allows
> companies to commercialize the product. I
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 05:50:58PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: > FreeBSD-3.3 have master.passwd with additional fields befor GECOS field.
: > This file have to be compiled to binary form /etc/pwd.db by pwd_db command,
: > AFAIR.
:
: #include "clu
Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FreeBSD-3.3 have master.passwd with additional fields befor GECOS field.
> This file have to be compiled to binary form /etc/pwd.db by pwd_db command,
> AFAIR.
#include "clueless-disclaimer"
No PAM in FreeBSD, wouldn't that solve it in some way?
>
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 04:45:46PM +0100, Per Lundberg wrote:
: > I didn't make any networking package. It is too early for this project.
: > More important is i.e. base-passwd package, but FreeBSD have completly
: > different passwd system...
:
: How is it different? You're thinking of the passwd
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> FreeBSD-3.3 have master.passwd with additional fields befor GECOS field.
> This file have to be compiled to binary form /etc/pwd.db by pwd_db command,
> AFAIR.
Okay. But there shouldn't really be a problem to debianize this stuff.
> Maybe someone wo
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Per Lundberg wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
>
> > I didn't make any networking package. It is too early for this project.
> > More important is i.e. base-passwd package, but FreeBSD have completly
> > different passwd system...
>
> How is it different?
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> I didn't make any networking package. It is too early for this project.
> More important is i.e. base-passwd package, but FreeBSD have completly
> different passwd system...
How is it different? You're thinking of the passwd.master (or what it's
call
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 November 1999, at 18 h 24, the keyboard of Piotr Roszatycki
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ftp://ftp.fnet.pl/pub/debian-freebsd/
> > There are 80 Debian packages for freebsd-i386 architecture.
>
on both Linux and FreeBSD. I'm not sure if the Debian tools are
good enough to support this, but I think Marcus Brinkmann discussed this
on the debian-hurd list earlier this year.
> The files in debian-freebsd/source is that the same as in the real
> debian archive of have you tweaked so
On Wednesday 17 November 1999, at 18 h 24, the keyboard of Piotr Roszatycki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ftp://ftp.fnet.pl/pub/debian-freebsd/
> There are 80 Debian packages for freebsd-i386 architecture.
Great job. Congratulations. Could we have a small documentation about its
inished ports
> shouldn't be a problem.
Ok, you can find it at http://master.debian.org/~dexter/
I've made a complete environment for developers (gcc, binutils, dpkg,
native libraries) so preparing new packages should be easy.
> The files in debian-freebsd/source is that the sa
e nice to have it there. It would mean that
it's an ``official'' port which could make it more easy to get bugs
fixed in the real debian packages.
Some questions:
The files in debian-freebsd/source is that the same as in the real
debian archive of have you tweaked something to get it t
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> > Seems pretty awesome! You should talk to the Debian archive maintainers to
> > get this onto the main sites. Are you a Debian maintainer?
> Yes :)
Great. Me too.
> But I'm afraid it is too early for getting it to main distribution.
> My propositio
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Per Lundberg wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
>
> > ftp://ftp.fnet.pl/pub/debian-freebsd/
> > There are 80 Debian packages for freebsd-i386 architecture.
>
> Seems pretty awesome! You should talk to the Debian archive maintainer
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> ftp://ftp.fnet.pl/pub/debian-freebsd/
> There are 80 Debian packages for freebsd-i386 architecture.
Seems pretty awesome! You should talk to the Debian archive maintainers to
get this onto the main sites. Are you a Debian maintainer?
ftp://ftp.fnet.pl/pub/debian-freebsd/
There are 80 Debian packages for freebsd-i386 architecture.
--
Piotr "Dexter" Roszatycki
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2 May 1999, Darren O. Benham wrote:
# This is just a start. Since it looks like there really is going to be an
# interest, debian-bsd@lists.debian.org has been created...
Yes and I am now subscribed. :) Note: what follows are
suggestions only and in some spots borders on rambling so
ple
On Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 03:54:47PM -0500, Steve Price wrote:
> I am very interested in your efforts. I am a FreeBSD user and
> a Linux user since 0.99.1. Though I can't speak for anyone else
> in the FreeBSD community except for myself, I can say I've heard
> quite a bit about Debian's package sy
47 matches
Mail list logo
