On 10/01/2014 00:38, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Robert Millan writes:
>
>> Have you tested this? I suspect -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE may introduce new
>> collisions given how opensolaris compat layer plays with foo64() function
>> names.
>
> Good question. I hadn't originally, but did just now, on (lin
Robert Millan writes:
> Have you tested this? I suspect -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE may introduce new
> collisions given how opensolaris compat layer plays with foo64() function
> names.
Good question. I hadn't originally, but did just now, on (linux-)i386.
It looks like only -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 i
On 09/01/2014 20:00, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Source: ctfutils
> Version: 9.2-4
> Severity: important
>
> ctfutils fails to build on platforms in which off_t is a 32-bit type
> by default, including in particular all 32-bit Linux platforms:
>
> In file included from /usr/include/bsd/stdio.h:30:0,
Source: ctfutils
Version: 9.2-4
Severity: important
ctfutils fails to build on platforms in which off_t is a 32-bit type
by default, including in particular all 32-bit Linux platforms:
In file included from /usr/include/bsd/stdio.h:30:0,
from /usr/include/freebsd/stdio.h:6,
4 matches
Mail list logo
