Re: Bug#677502: unblock: lv2file/0.83-1

2012-06-15 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 15/06/12 08:44, Alessio Treglia wrote: > Applied, thank you very much! And now lv2file is built too. It should be able to migrate tonight. Therefore I'm closing this 'unblock' request which isn't needed now. Thanks! Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: Bug#677502: unblock: lv2file/0.83-1

2012-06-15 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Sorry, that patch got mixed in with the other diff.  Attaching a > corrected version. Applied, thank you very much! -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Develop

Re: Bug#677502: unblock: lv2file/0.83-1

2012-06-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Sorry, that patch got mixed in with the other diff. Attaching a corrected version. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org From: Steven Chamberlain Subject: Fix build on GNU/kFreeBSD * Still need to link with -ldl, unlike regular BSD * Remove extraneous -llilv, which swig2.0 on BSD-l

Re: Bug#677502: unblock: lv2file/0.83-1

2012-06-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
>> [ 2/26] swig: bindings/lilv.i -> build/bindings/lilv.swigwrap_6.cxx >> build/bindings/lilv.py >> :6: Error: Unable to find 'lilv' Hi again, I realised the :6: refers to the command-line parameter "-llilv" to swig2.0. Should that really be there? There is no file with that name, which is why

Re: Bug#677502: unblock: lv2file/0.83-1

2012-06-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 14/06/12 13:10, Alessio Treglia wrote: > I'd like to have some hints from you on how to fix the following issue: > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Steven Chamberlain > wrote: >> The issue with lilv looks fixable but could be a swig bug so it could >> take a while. A search for a file call

Re: Bug#677502: unblock: lv2file/0.83-1

2012-06-14 Thread Alessio Treglia
Hi guys, I'd like to have some hints from you on how to fix the following issue: On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Or it's new dependency, lilv, just needs porting to kFreeBSD, then > lv2file will probably build there again? > > The issue with lilv looks fixable but co