Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Version: 9.0-3 On 14/06/13 01:03, Christoph Egger wrote: > Steven Chamberlain writes: >> Now that this happened, could you please give back cmor for a rebuild on >> kfreebsd-amd64? AFAIK it is still not expected to build on kfreebsd-i386. > > Done, let's see Thanks! It built fine. Closing th

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-13 Thread Christoph Egger
Steven Chamberlain writes: > Hi Christoph, > > On 05/05/12 15:33, Christoph Egger wrote: >> The buildds will only get the new kernel some time after the wheezy >> release [...] > > Now that this happened, could you please give back cmor for a rebuild on > kfreebsd-amd64? AFAIK it is still not exp

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi Christoph, On 05/05/12 15:33, Christoph Egger wrote: > The buildds will only get the new kernel some time after the wheezy > release [...] Now that this happened, could you please give back cmor for a rebuild on kfreebsd-amd64? AFAIK it is still not expected to build on kfreebsd-i386. Thanks

Processed: Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-06-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # hopefully done with this now... > fixed 661283 kfreebsd-8/8.3-2 Bug #661283 [kfreebsd-8] cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 Marked as fixed in versions kfreebsd-8/8.3-2. > fixed 661283 kfreebsd-9/9.0-3 Bug #661283 [kfreebsd-8] cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd

Processed: Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-06-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 661283 kfreebsd-8 Bug #661283 [src:cmor] cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 Bug reassigned from package 'src:cmor' to 'kfreebsd-8'. No longer marked as found in versions cmor/2.8.0-2. No longer marked as fixed in versions kfreebsd-9/9.0-3 and

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-06-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 661283 + squeeze Bug #661283 [src:cmor] cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 Added tag(s) squeeze. > block 661283 by 669170 Bug #661283 [src:cmor] cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 661283 was not blocked by any bugs. 661283 was not blocking any bugs. Ad

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-05-05 Thread Robert Millan
2012/5/5 Christoph Egger : >  The buildds will only get the new kernel some time after the wheezy > release (It *might* be possible to get a backports kernel but only iff > we are really sure the kfreebsd-8 kernel from testing rebuilt in stable > will work well with freebsd-utils and stuff from 8.1

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-05-05 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > This issue was worked around with a binNMU. It is fixed in kfreebsd-8 > VCS and kfreebsd-9 unstable by raising DFLDSIZ. > > I don't know if this has been changed yet on the buildd's, which I think > run a squeeze kernel but DFLDSIZ is a boot-time configurable set

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-05-04 Thread Robert Millan
2012/5/5 Steven Chamberlain : > Upstream does it that way, but I'm not sure if GNU/kFreeBSD does (I see > no mention of ulimit in /etc?).  But if so, it would explain why this > was reproducible on buildd's and not on the asdfasdf porter box. ulimit is just the user interface. This is set by PAM,

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-05-04 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 04/05/12 23:10, Robert Millan wrote: > Actually, I think that increasing DFLDSIZ might not be the only > solution. DFLDSIZ only sets the default limit, but for login shells > it is increased automatically. Upstream does it that way, but I'm not sure if GNU/kFreeBSD does (I see no mention of ul

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-05-04 Thread Robert Millan
2012/5/4 Steven Chamberlain : > This issue was worked around with a binNMU.  It is fixed in kfreebsd-8 > VCS and kfreebsd-9 unstable by raising DFLDSIZ. > > I don't know if this has been changed yet on the buildd's, which I think > run a squeeze kernel but DFLDSIZ is a boot-time configurable settin

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-05-04 Thread Steven Chamberlain
severity 661283 important thanks Hi, This issue was worked around with a binNMU. It is fixed in kfreebsd-8 VCS and kfreebsd-9 unstable by raising DFLDSIZ. I don't know if this has been changed yet on the buildd's, which I think run a squeeze kernel but DFLDSIZ is a boot-time configurable settin

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-04-17 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 17/04/12 23:02, Robert Millan wrote: > El 14 de març de 2012 15:46, Christoph Egger ha escrit: >> kern.dfldsiz: 134217728 > > That's just 128 MiB. Argh I misunderstood this before. Yes 128 MiB is definitely too low for cmor; it seems to need ~700 MiB to pass the test suite or run at all.

Processed (with 3 errors): Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 661283 -1 Bug #661283 [src:cmor] cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 Bug 661283 cloned as bug 669170 > retitle -1 increase DFLDSIZ on amd64 to something good enough to build cmor Bug #669170 [src:cmor] cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 Changed Bug tit

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-04-17 Thread Robert Millan
clone 661283 -1 retitle -1 increase DFLDSIZ on amd64 to something good enough to build cmor severity -1 wishlist clone -1 -2 -3 reassign -1 kfreebsd-8 reassign -2 kfreebsd-9 reassign -3 kfreebsd-10 thanks El 14 de març de 2012 15:46, Christoph Egger ha escrit: >  kern.dfldsiz: 134217728 That's j

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-04-15 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Is it worth giving cmor back to the kfreebsd-amd64 buildd's (more than > once, if necessary), as it does succeed about 50% of the time. > > The netcdf 4.1.4 transition is held up by this. If it works, we won't > have to worry so much about fixing it right now, or

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-04-15 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi Christoph, Is it worth giving cmor back to the kfreebsd-amd64 buildd's (more than once, if necessary), as it does succeed about 50% of the time. The netcdf 4.1.4 transition is held up by this. If it works, we won't have to worry so much about fixing it right now, or the problem may even go aw

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-03-14 Thread Christoph Egger
Steven Chamberlain writes: > I'm curious anyway what are the kern.maxdsiz and kern.dfldsiz on the > buildds (I'm guessing 1GiB on amd64) and is it permissible for them to > be raised (to maybe 2GiB) if some package like this one required it? > (I'm also wondering about the openjdk-7 failures here.

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-03-13 Thread Steven Chamberlain
reopen 661283 done On 03/03/12 14:11, Julien Cristau wrote: > I gave it back and it built, so closing. Hi, Doesn't this want fixing more permanently? It got queued for a rebuild for some reason and has been failing again since: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=cmor&arch=kfreebsd-a

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-03-03 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > It is trying to map a range 0->0x29fa3000 = ~671MiB bytes which is why > it fails in my VM which has only 512MiB RAM. The value being requested > as length here appears to be a pointer. > > Jakub Wilk wrote: >> FWIW, I can't reproduce this failure on asdfasdf.deb

Re: Bug#661283: cmor: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

2012-03-02 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, Building cmor 2.8.0-2 fails for me in exactly the same place but with different error codes. This is kfreebsd-i386 with up-to-date Wheezy, running in VirtualBox limited to 512MiB RAM and no swap: > GNU C (Debian 4.6.2-12) version 4.6.2 (i486-kfreebsd-gnu) > compiled by GNU C version 4.