On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:24:31PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 10 de gener de 2012 0:21, Vagrant Cascadian ha escrit:
> > would each depend on the current kfreebsd-image-X-* packages, where X was
> > the
> > current preferred/default version in a given release.
>
> That's a very subjective
El 10 de gener de 2012 0:21, Vagrant Cascadian ha escrit:
> would each depend on the current kfreebsd-image-X-* packages, where X was the
> current preferred/default version in a given release.
That's a very subjective question. We provide 8.x and 9.x kernels,
like upstream does. Both are suppor
Source: kfreebsd-8
Severity: wishlist
please consider providing unversioned meta-packages for kfreebsd-image and
related packages, much like the linux-latest package is handled. for example:
kfreebsd-image-486, kfreebsd-image-amd64, kfreebsd-image-686,
kfreebsd-image-xen, etc.
would each de
3 matches
Mail list logo