Hi!
On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 01:50:19 +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> > > in order to avoid the conflict with "sysstat". However, the
> > > [...]
> >
> > Could you explain this conflict in more detail? Why can't iostat be
> > in /usr/bin?
> A priori the package "sysstat" installs the file "/us
lördag den 8 oktober 2011 klockan 13:55 skrev Robert Millan detta:
> 2011/10/8 Mats Erik Andersson :
> > A priori the package "sysstat" installs the file "/usr/bin/iostat"
> > at the most natural location for Debian. Observe, however, that FreeBSD
> > locates its native executable in "/usr/sbin/io
2011/10/8 Mats Erik Andersson :
> A priori the package "sysstat" installs the file "/usr/bin/iostat"
> at the most natural location for Debian. Observe, however, that FreeBSD
> locates its native executable in "/usr/sbin/iostat".
Does sysstat even work on kernels other than Linux? It looks very
L
> > in order to avoid the conflict with "sysstat". However, the
> > [...]
>
> Could you explain this conflict in more detail? Why can't iostat be
> in /usr/bin?
A priori the package "sysstat" installs the file "/usr/bin/iostat"
at the most natural location for Debian. Observe, however, that Free
Hi Mats,
2011/10/8 Mats Erik Andersson :
> The present patch takes the upstream code and deposits the
> executable as
>
> /lib/freebsd/iostat
>
> in order to avoid the conflict with "sysstat". However, the
> corresponding manual page is not installed by the patch.
> Personally I would prefer to
Package: freebsd-utils
Version: 8.2+ds2-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please consider including FreeBSD's own "iostat" in this package.
Until I have finished writing the addition of "diskstats" to linprocfs,
the package "netstat" produces an executable "iostat" which gives no
information at all
6 matches
Mail list logo
