2011/2/8 Guillem Jover :
> [...] upstream might not
> have enabled them because they are not deemed ready for wider use,
> for stability, performance, or other reasons.
>
> A possible solution to this could be to build another kernel image
> flavour with some default diverging options enabled, and
Hi!
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 18:55:25 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >If you and other are of the view that the BTS is the best
> >first step, then I will abide that mechanism of raising any
> >issues concerning the capacity of the packaged kernel.
>
> The mails into BTS are forwarded to maintainer e
Mats Erik Andersson writes:
> Anyway, there is certainly functionality that is not default
> in upstream FreeBSD, but could justly be considered mandatory
> for GNU/kFreeBSD. Could we collect some kind of central information
> source on this matter?
Thanks for the reminder. I added
== Q. How do
A particular example I have encounterd is "ipsec-tools"
where a recent upload aims at adaptions to BSD, but where
the present kernel is neither supporting the API, nor the
relevant devices. Here I will prepare information for making
an official decision in the end, but other cases are certain
to e
2011/2/8 Mats Erik Andersson :
> If you and other are of the view that the BTS is the best
> first step, then I will abide that mechanism of raising any
> issues concerning the capacity of the packaged kernel.
That's my first impression, but keep in mind my voice is not
authoritative. I'm just pr
tisdag den 8 februari 2011 klockan 15:50 skrev Robert Millan detta:
> 2011/2/8 Mats Erik Andersson :
> > Anyway, there is certainly functionality that is not default
> > in upstream FreeBSD, but could justly be considered mandatory
> > for GNU/kFreeBSD. Could we collect some kind of central inform
On 02-08 14:49, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> let me initiate a spinoff subject related to Axel Beckert's
> followup from the FOSDEM meeting.
>
> My interest in activating
>
>option QUOTA
>
> is well known. My work from last week points also to
>
>option IPSEC
>option
2011/2/8 Mats Erik Andersson :
> Anyway, there is certainly functionality that is not default
> in upstream FreeBSD, but could justly be considered mandatory
> for GNU/kFreeBSD. Could we collect some kind of central information
> source on this matter?
I would suggest using the BTS for this. Is t
Dear all,
let me initiate a spinoff subject related to Axel Beckert's
followup from the FOSDEM meeting.
My interest in activating
option QUOTA
is well known. My work from last week points also to
option IPSEC
option IPSEC_NAT_T
device crypto
device enc
However, I have identifie
9 matches
Mail list logo
