On 19/08/2013 10:24, Petr Salinger wrote:
>> Sure. Will do both things. Thanks for the insight.
>
> Iff you have some spare time, please look at kfreebsd-kernel-headers,
> they still B-D on kfreebsd-source-9.1.
Done now.
This really should be part of kfreebsd package like linux-libc-dev
does... un
Sure. Will do both things. Thanks for the insight.
Iff you have some spare time, please look at kfreebsd-kernel-headers,
they still B-D on kfreebsd-source-9.1.
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Hi Steven,
On 18/08/2013 14:15, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> That does seem reasonable and I'm happy for you to do that...
>
> But the release notes[0] for 9.2-RC2 mention some known issues in RC1
> (presumably introduced since 9.1). If 9.2-RC1 is allowed to migrate,
> th
Hi,
On 17/08/13 20:07, Robert Millan wrote:
> If nothing happens, kFreeBSD 9.2-RC1 will migrate to testing tomorrow.
> In order to avoid preventing this migration, I plan on uploading 9.2-RC2
> right afterwards.
That does seem reasonable and I'm happy for you to do that...
But the
If nothing happens, kFreeBSD 9.2-RC1 will migrate to testing tomorrow.
In order to avoid preventing this migration, I plan on uploading 9.2-RC2
right afterwards.
Is everyone okay with that?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
5 matches
Mail list logo