On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
Wiadomość napisana przez Jonathan Nieder w dniu 2011-06-17, o godz. 12:01:
Robert Millan wrote:
I wouldn't consider kfreebsd-9 a solution to your linprocfs
problem, it is only barely usable yet (see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/06
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:19:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630104: fixed in kfreebsd-8 8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #630104,
regarding [kfreebsd] pstree -a: /proc/19/cmdline: Bad address
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Wiadomość napisana przez Jonathan Nieder w dniu 2011-06-17, o godz. 12:01:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't consider kfreebsd-9 a solution to your linprocfs
>> problem, it is only barely usable yet (see
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/06/msg00208.html)
>
> Let's add to that list.
Do you think the patch in #628954 should be included? I asked
upstream if they plan to MFC it, and got no response.
I see no reason for not including it, especially, as you need it and
tested it on your machine ;-)
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
2011/6/17 Petr Salinger :
>> We need to make sure the GCC upgrade didn't cause any
>> regression before new sid uploads can be made.
>
> Nobody objected so far, it have been available for one week.
> Time to ship it into unstable ;-)
Do you think the patch in #628954 should be included? I asked
u
2011/6/17 Jonathan Nieder :
> I'll go back to kfreebsd-8 to help the war effort. Still, it's nice
> to see something close to CURRENT is available.
Yes please. With kfreebsd-9 upload I didn't mean to draw attention
from kfreebsd-8. Testing those package is more important IMHO.
--
Robert Milla
If you want to help getting it fixed in sid, you can test
kfreebsd-8 8.2-1.1 in experimental.
It have been reported againts 8.2-1.1 primarily ;-)
We need to make sure the GCC upgrade didn't cause any
regression before new sid uploads can be made.
Nobody objected so far, it have been availabl
Robert Millan wrote:
> I wouldn't consider kfreebsd-9 a solution to your linprocfs
> problem, it is only barely usable yet (see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/06/msg00208.html)
Let's add to that list. ;-)
lock order reversal:
1st 0xff803d300018 bufwait (bufwait) @ kern/vfs_bio.
2011/6/17 Jonathan Nieder :
>> [ Petr Salinger ]
>> * Add 111_linprocfs_kthread.diff. Closes: #630104.
>
> Thanks, Petr, too. :) "pstree -a" works now.
I wouldn't consider kfreebsd-9 a solution to your linprocfs
problem, it is only barely usable yet (see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2
Robert Millan wrote:
> kfreebsd-9 (9.0~svn223109-0.1) experimental; urgency=low
Hoorah! Thank you, Robert.
>[ Petr Salinger ]
>* Add 111_linprocfs_kthread.diff. Closes: #630104.
Thanks, Petr, too. :) "pstree -a" works now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debi
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:18:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630104: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.0~svn223109-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #630104,
regarding [kfreebsd] pstree -a: /proc/19/cmdline: Bad address
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Typical kfreebsd-amd64 experimental system, kernel =
kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-amd64 8.2-1.1. When I try to run
"pstree -a", I get:
$ pstree -a
/proc/19/cmdline: Bad address
Indeed:
$ ps 19
PID TTYSTATTIME COMMAND
19 ? S+ 0:00 [
Package: kfreebsd-8
Version: 8.2-1.1
Hi,
Typical kfreebsd-amd64 experimental system, kernel =
kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-amd64 8.2-1.1. When I try to run
"pstree -a", I get:
$ pstree -a
/proc/19/cmdline: Bad address
Indeed:
$ ps 19
PID TTYSTATTIME COMMA
13 matches
Mail list logo
