Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-06-03 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:03:13PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2012/5/31 Dominic Hargreaves : > > This is now hitting us with the packaging of perl 5.16. Can you provide > > a reference which might enable us know which outcome to expect, so that > > the test[1] can be updated accordingly? > > I

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-06-02 Thread Robert Millan
2012/5/31 Dominic Hargreaves : > This is now hitting us with the packaging of perl 5.16. Can you provide > a reference which might enable us know which outcome to expect, so that > the test[1] can be updated accordingly? I just requested a version bump, see http://bugs.debian.org/675606 -- Rober

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-05-31 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 02:16:49PM +, Robert Millan wrote: > El 12 de febrer de 2012 12:42, Niko Tyni ha escrit: > > [crossposted to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD development list debian-bsd > >                         and the Perl 5 development list perl5-porters ] > > Thanks for bringing this up.

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-02-12 Thread Leon Timmermans
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > Also what does it even mean that threads have pids? Can you kill(1) > threads individuall? Send signals to them that aren't sent to the > parent process etc? I'm getting mixed test results[1] from CPANTesters related to inter-threa

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-02-12 Thread Robert Millan
El 12 de febrer de 2012 21:05, Leon Timmermans ha escrit: > I'm getting mixed test results[1] from CPANTesters related to > inter-thread signalling, despite all having the same OS version > (8.1-1-686). Not sure I can explain what's going on (though it's not > the only platform suffering from this

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-02-12 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 16:31, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > I obviously much prefer #1, and I don't think it would harm kFreeBSD > users, what do you think? Has the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port had many > issues due to differences in getpid()/getppid() behavior? I've pushed a patch implementing #

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-02-12 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 15:16, Robert Millan wrote: > El 12 de febrer de 2012 12:42, Niko Tyni ha escrit: >> [crossposted to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD development list debian-bsd >>                         and the Perl 5 development list perl5-porters ] > > Thanks for bringing this up. > >>> This i

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-02-12 Thread Leon Timmermans
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > I have no idea whether it's really LinuxThreads based or something > else, but please note that Debian GNU/kFreeBSD seems to be affected as > t/op/getpid.t started failing there with 0e21945565eb4664d84 (around > Perl 5.15.1). See [perl #96270].

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-02-12 Thread Robert Millan
El 12 de febrer de 2012 12:42, Niko Tyni ha escrit: > [crossposted to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD development list debian-bsd >                         and the Perl 5 development list perl5-porters ] Thanks for bringing this up. >> This is also a complete non-issue in practice these days, LinuxThrea

Re: [PATCH] Further eliminate POSIX-emulation under LinuxThreads

2012-02-12 Thread Niko Tyni
[crossposted to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD development list debian-bsd and the Perl 5 development list perl5-porters ] On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 07:57:43PM +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > [This is a patch I've just committed to > avar/remove-linuxthreads-pid-caching) I'