Re: extraneous packages in kfreebsd-i386 archive (was Re: (wishlist) Re: edos.debian.net)

2007-01-07 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 13:26:38 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > There are many failures due to packages currently arch all, > which have been formerly any. > > Could be they just deleted from kfreebsd-i386 unstable archive ? > List with 116 source packages enclosed. > > The similar deletion should b

extraneous packages in kfreebsd-i386 archive (was Re: (wishlist) Re: edos.debian.net)

2007-01-06 Thread Petr Salinger
Kfreebsd is now included in the daily edso-debcheck, see http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/ There are many failures due to packages currently arch all, which have been formerly any. Could be they just deleted from kfreebsd-i386 unstable archive ? List with 116 source packages enclosed.

Re: (wishlist) Re: edos.debian.net

2007-01-06 Thread Ralf Treinen
Hello, On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > >>>On my side, I would ask edos.debian.net maintainers to add, if not too > >>>difficult, the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 architectures as is > >>>already the case on packages.debian.org (and, why not, hurd-i386, > >>>ar

Re: (wishlist) Re: edos.debian.net

2007-01-05 Thread Petr Salinger
What is "unreleased"? Is it an alias for "experimental"? In "unreleased" are packages with extra patch applied, usually based on some (recent) version from unstable. See also end of http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/kfreebsd-i386 Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: (wishlist) Re: edos.debian.net

2007-01-05 Thread Ralf Treinen
Hi, On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > Hi. > > >>>On my side, I would ask edos.debian.net maintainers to add, if not too > >>>difficult, the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 architectures as is > >>>already the case on packages.debian.org (and, why not, hurd-i386, >

Re: (wishlist) Re: edos.debian.net

2007-01-04 Thread Petr Salinger
Hi. On my side, I would ask edos.debian.net maintainers to add, if not too difficult, the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 architectures as is already the case on packages.debian.org (and, why not, hurd-i386, armeb, m32r and other prospective ports). With pleasure. Just tell me from where I ca

Re: (wishlist) Re: edos.debian.net

2007-01-04 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:13:10PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Frederic Lehobey wrote: > > On my side, I would ask edos.debian.net maintainers to add, if not too > > difficult, the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 architectures as is > > already the