I noticed that one kfreebsd-amd64 buildd (kamp) is operational and is
currently happily building the huge backlog of packages.
Many thanks to the people responsible for this.
В Tue, 16 Jan 2018 23:23:43 +0100, Christoph Egger написа:
> I guess the hurd example shows that very few people can sucecssfully run
> a port -- for a release architecture you need a couple more people.
Exactly. Right now the goal should be to run the port, with a priority
to restore the buildd
В Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:08:20 +0100, Axel Beckert написа:
> I can imagine doing sysadmin work on buildds.
I can also host a buildd at home, no restrictions AFAICT.
Administration can be handled remotely by a DD if I'm not able to do
the job properly and/or I'm not being trusted. I can't participat
В Mon, 08 Jan 2018 12:32:33 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt написа:
> But we would need people to commit to that: someone has to address
> issues that arise (these do not have to be Debian Developers, though
> ports should have at least some Debian Developers commit to them);
I'm not qualified to work on
В Fri, 05 Jan 2018 11:41:08 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt написа:
> I'm wondering if there is still any interest in keeping kFreeBSD in
> unstable?
There is interest, but it is not clear to me what has to be done to keep
the port alive. How can non-DDs help to resurrect the port?
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:10:16PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Package: gnustep-back-common
> Version: 0.20.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid wheezy
> It seems that gnustep-back-common fails to install in sid on
> kfreebsd-* machines. This has been noticed while trying to build
> gnustep-dl2 [1
reassign 644868 libgnustep-base1.22
retitle 644868 Programs abort on kfreebsd* when arguments exceed 512
affects 644868 gnustep-back-common
block 629477 with 644868
thanks
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:02:25PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: gnustep-back-common
> Version: 0.20.1-2
> Severity: s
David Prévot wrote:
> is it safe to close this bug
Yes, it is -- I'm doing it now. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ipwop9hv.GNUs_Not_Unix!%ya.
tags 593898 + pending
thanks
[libk...@p.d.o BCCed -- relevant part at the end of the message.]
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > If not, then the -art backend package must surely depend on it.
> > If yes, running with --GNU-Debug=ftfont might give some clues why
> > this happens.
>
> As this just affects
Dear GNU/kFreeBSD porters,
Is this the right fix for the recent build failure of gnustep-base in
experimental [*]? Thanks in advance!
[*]
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gnustep-base&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=1.20.0-1&stamp=1274719148&file=log&as=raw
=== modified file 'Source/ObjectiveC2/
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > Package: gajim
> > Version: 0.12.1-2
> > Severity: important
> >
> > I cannot connect to my server (jabber.minus273.org) -- Gajim
> > displays the blue icon indicating it's connecting, but the UI
>
forwarded 531167 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115623
thanks
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 03:42:52PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> The PCMCIA Xircom CardBus Ethernet 10/100 card I have does not work
It looks like this is known upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-r
tags 419081 - patch
thanks
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:00:14PM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The Debian GNU/kNetBSD port is referred incorrectly as "GNU/NetBSD".
>
> No, the port is correctly referred, becuse it's based on the NetBSD libc
> and BSD userland. So it's not like in the GNU/k*BSD port
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
Tags: patch
[(X-Debbugs-)CCing the porters' list]
The Debian GNU/kNetBSD port is referred incorrectly as "GNU/NetBSD".
I assume this mistake was not intentional and the pages just haven't
been updated for a while. By contrast, this is not the case with
Instead of arguing about the "From" header and generating traffic that
might be interesting, but not important at all, why don't we express
our warm gratitude and congratulate the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD team for
the *great* work they have done by making yet another variant of GNU a
reality?
Their wor
15 matches
Mail list logo
