Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-06 Thread Sven Luther
Friendly, Sven Luther On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:45:35AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > The final results are in: > > Summary table: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---++-++-++---++-- > armel || 3 |

Re: [Parted-maintainers] Bug#392767: Fixed RC bug in frozen parted : #392767: [mac] parted is unable to reread partition tables created by d-i/partman.

2006-11-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:14:27AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:14:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:08:26PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > > I'm sorry. Please feel free to disable the patch; I'm thinking it was

Re: [Parted-maintainers] Bug#392767: parted and GNU/kFreeBSD (Re: Fixed RC bug in frozen parted : #392767: [mac] parted is unable to reread partition tables created by d-i/partman.)

2006-11-07 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:48:35AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:14:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:08:26PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > > > I'm sorry. Please feel free to disable the patch;

Re: Fixed RC bug in frozen parted : #392767: [mac] parted is unable to reread partition tables created by d-i/partman.

2006-11-07 Thread Sven Luther
t; Apologises for the hassle. No problem, i am happy we found it before the release though. Will you be able to work out a better/cleaner patch ? And work with us to merge it upstream ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [D-I] mass kernel udeb update and preparations for RC1

2006-09-19 Thread Sven Luther
week to confirm this. I don't particularly feel like backporting those fixes to 2.6.17, especially as the etch kernel target is 2.6.18, but others may volunteer to do it, or i may do it if i find some time. Friendlly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: D-I Etch Beta2 - Status update (4)

2006-03-07 Thread Sven Luther
produce the compressed vmlinuz-* kernel, and dding it to a prep partition). Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)

2003-12-18 Thread Sven Luther
the first half signify which libc is used. However, > if Debian is always going to use the GNU/ prefix, then perhaps make it > something like > > Debian GNU/NBSD/NBSD > > with the third part signifying the libc used. I would better say that the second part be the libc, and that it can be omitted if it is the same as most userland. That said, we don't have only GNU stuff as userland. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: [OT] Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)

2003-12-18 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:26:10AM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Well, just for the record, i personnally would prefer we don't use > > demon name for keyword if possible. > > Forgive me for the gratuit

Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)

2003-12-17 Thread Sven Luther
name it), so the names are indeed related to the evil they represent in the christian mythology. On a side note, i also prefer the Pratchet names over the Tolkien ones, but either would be fine. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: g77 issues

2001-04-19 Thread Sven LUTHER
I bet it isn't really 1 (actually > 1.000111022302 ;-) Maybe there's no bug: it's just truncation > error? Maybe the maths unit on the alpha is better than the one on the ia32 > on > this test (no suprise there!) Also, note that alpha is a 64bit plateform

Re: call for ports to begin using 2.4.0 headers for glibc

2001-01-16 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:26:03PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 11:05:39PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > Well, the big deal is that to enable LFS on glibc, it must be compiled > > against 2.4.0 headers. This does not break when running on 2.2.x > You mean we have to