On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Dan Papasian wrote:
>
> The FHS is a load of crap. There are plently of standards existing
> beforehand for the layout of the UNIX filesystem.. Linux, aiming to act
> exactly like a UNIX, should follow these, not set their own standards.
>
Plenty of standards? Isn'
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Steve Price wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Steve Shorter wrote:
>
> # I would like GNU tools, debian package system, debian userland
> # with a FreeBSD kernel as an "out of the box" thing.
> If you haven't already you might want to install F
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Dan Papasian wrote:
> I'll analyze these one by one.
>
> GNU tools: Which ones, and why replace the existing ones?
> Do you know/care if you have GNU find vs BSD find?
> Can you even tell the difference between GNU cp and BSD cp?
Yeh.
GNU cp
cp some_dir someother_d
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
>
> Oki :
> Debian FreeBSD/FreeBSD will install to /usr/local/
> Debian GNU/Linux will install to /usr/
> Debian GNU/Hurd will install to /
> Debian CygWin/NT will use C:\Program Files
>
> Is this acceptable solution ?
> (nothing is using /opt/ yet
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Dan Papasian wrote:
>
> As a contributor to FreeBSD, I need specific things that you'd like
> us to fix. FreeBSD has a good stability record too..
> The message I'm getting (Which I'm damn near positive you don't want
> to send) is "Well FreeBSD is great but it isn't debi
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is the list not working or is there no traffic?
>
Good Question.
What is the approach being taken? Porting glibc seems to be the
best solution. Is someone working on this? Or some other approach or is
there no longer an
6 matches
Mail list logo
