ved in getting the porters access to
porter boxes? Porter boxes exist so that DDs *not* involved in a port have
access to a machine of the architecture and can keep their packages working.
I've never heard of a porter who didn't have access to their own box
3 21:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > >>> On 20/05/13 at 18:19 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > >>> - Neither systemd nor upstart are likely to be ported to kfreebsd soon,
> > >>> as they both rely on many Linux-specific features and interfaces.
start, so I'm skeptical of this being an openldap bug.
> Full build log at
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openldap&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=2.4.28-1&stamp=1325787980
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free O
file,
> because they are probably not to be ported to non-Linux systems, due to
> strong Linux dependency.
>
> Could people below consider using
>
> Architecture: linux-any
>
> instead of
>
> Architecture: any
>
> in their next upload? That would help us clean
oving libglitz is more painful than it would be otherwise,
because instead of just rebuilding cairo itself without glitz, you must
rebuild everything above cairo in the stack that used pkg-config for
linking.
I don't argue that this makes --as-needed *correct* as a default
(I doubt 'sysctl -x' is the interface we want
to use from inside pam_limits, and anyway, I have no idea how to parse the
line you quoted above.)
If someone were to provide a preliminary patch implementing this, that would
be most welcome.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever lon
as-root targets,
so even using -rsudo should be ok, yes?)
So, downgrading, though obviously we should want to see this fixed.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL P
7 matches
Mail list logo
