Re: using debian/kfreebsd on daily usage

2010-04-29 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:10:40PM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > hi, > > i'm just curious, how you find running debian/kfreebsd for normal work (word > processing, spreadsheet, presentation, emailing) so far? > my main concern is my daily life as a sysadmin. May I in turn ask what benefits or

Re: migration to testing

2010-04-14 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:38:38PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:34:03PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit : > > > > Because nobody on kfreebsd list was interested, and I myself is not > > interested in that architecture, I decided to limit the AR

Re: migration to testing

2010-04-14 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:19:18PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > The package builds on kfreebsd just fine, but I never tested if it > really works there. Actually, before the last upload the package did > not have any explicit dependency on fuse-utils, that is why it > migrate

Re: migration to testing

2010-04-05 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot > &

Re: migration to testing

2010-03-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot > > migrate to testing. The migration is blocked by kfreebsd: > >