Hi. I have just uploaded pam_0.75-1 to experimental. This release is
mostly just a porting heads up release for people to test and make
sure that their applications still build, that PAM still minimally
works and that I haven't introduced some horrible packaging bug.
It would be appreciated if
Is dpkg-shlibdeps broken on NetBSD or just FreeBSD?
I've checked in a preliminary implementation of the build proposal I
made here. It's very sketchy now, but you can all look at it and make
comments.
The packages directory contains a bsd-buildtools package, which
installs bsd-buildpackage in /usr/bin. If you run this script in a
patch director
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 04:17:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:36:01PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > >>>>> "utsl" == utsl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > utsl> This is a good idea. I'm interes
> "utsl" == utsl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
utsl> This is a good idea. I'm interested in it. Why not simply
utsl> import the standard Debian source packages as vendor
utsl> branches, and use the normal CVS facilities to track the
utsl> changes? This seems simpler than keepin
> "Joel" == Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joel> I'll worry about this when it doesn't require a chroot
Joel> tarball just to get things up and running. Until then... the
Joel> only folks who're likely to be even remotely interested in
Joel> debugging are the diehards,
As I mentioned Saturday, I'm interested in helping set up some sort of
system for managing patches that we are not comfortable sending back
to Debian packages yet.
I'm concerned that without such a system:
* Different people will each set up their own archives of packages
with different mecha
>>>>> "Fabio" == Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Fabio> Sam Hartman wrote:
>> E
>>
Fabio> [snip]
>>
>>
>> Yet I want to be able to maintain these patches, share them
>>
E
I'm finding that I'd like to be able to build my own versions of
system packages and to rebuild a chroot myself in order to debug
things. I also believe I want a mechanism for maintaining diffs to
the Debian sources that are not clean enough to apply upstream yet.
For example we don't have tete
I haven't really gotten a chance to look at this, mostly just playing
around.
I was able to build ed (wanted some sort of reasonable text editor)
but it didn't work. Whenever I attempt to make a substitution, it
dumps core in regexec.I should build a debugging libc, debugging
ed, etc.
As a
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sam Hartman
Matthew> wrote:
>> Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread.
>> Does anyone have apt
>>>>> "utsl" == utsl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
utsl> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread.
>> Does anyone have apt-get working (instead of s
> "Jeremy" == Jeremy C Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeremy> It all depends on your (or RMS's) personal definition of
Jeremy> "freedom". Definitely BSD websites promote free software
Jeremy> -- in fact, they encourage the use of their code in
Jeremy> proprietary, closed-sou
So, there was mention of tackling PAM after shadow gets working.
Speaking as PAM maintainer, I will not accept new patches for
portability to the Debian PAM 0.72 packages. We're already too far
out of date with regard to upstream. If patches are submitted I'll
ask people to redo them after I
Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread. Does anyone
have apt-get working (instead of segfaulting) using the apt in the
distributed chroot? If so, how? If not, does anyone have apt working
using other builds?
> "Ian" == Ian Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> Re: Project StatusDo you drink Jolt Cola? - Original
Ian> Message - From: Andreas Krennmair To: Debian-BSD
Ian> Mailinglist Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:41 AM Subject: Re:
Ian> Project Status
Ian> On Sun,
16 matches
Mail list logo
