Bug#612498: open-vm-tools: Preliminary support for kfreebsd

Source: open-vm-tools Version: 2:8.8.0+2011.10.26-514583-1 Followup-For: Bug #612498 Hello, I managed to add preliminary support for kfreebsd to open-vm-tools. Placing attached patch '02-kfreebsd.patch' in debian/patches, adding the filename to debian/patches/series and adding 'libkvm-dev' to

Re: open-vm-tools

On 11/17/2011 07:45 PM, Robert Millan wrote: I have no idea if all is fine, but a package has been built, vmtoolsd is running, and vcenter shows the vm's hostname. Have you tested them? Apart from doing 'hostname ' in the vm and seeing the hostname in virtual center change, no. I didn't

open-vm-tools

Hi, I've had a bit of success building open-vm-tools on kfreebsd/amd64. I have no idea if all is fine, but a package has been built, vmtoolsd is running, and vcenter shows the vm's hostname. I have a 4000+ lines patch, 160kB. Most of it came from running autoconf. I had to skip services/plugins

IPv6 configuration

Hi, I found some problems with IPv6. First is /sbin/ifup, which needs to add family type inet6 to ifconfig, and second is /sbin/route which doesn't set family type properly and knows only about ipv6 addresses. I have attached a patch for both. Shall I submit bugs for these? Robin diff -ur

Re: kfreebsd future

Petr Salinger wrote: > kfreebsd-amd64 have only 6.x kernels, half of popcon registered users > already uses 6.x kernels on kfreebsd-i386. Oh sorry, I'll re-run popcon immediately :) I'm in favor of using 6.1 default; we use 6.1 default on our FreeBSD machines now as well. Robin -- To UNSUBS

Re: uname -o on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD?

On 8-jun-2006, at 19:59, Kari Pahula wrote: What's the output of uname -o on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD? Upstream wants to know for #370470. Here's all of the options for completeness: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname --help Usage: uname [OPTION]... Print certain system information. With no OPTION, sa

postfix patch

Hi, I'm working on getting postfix built natively on GNU/kFreeBSD (and GNU/Hurd). I took the patch I made a long time ago. The GNU/Hurd patch, which is already in the Debian postfix package, is almost similar (should be, because it's mostly cut&paste). The one thing Wietse Venema is worr

Re: amavisd-new start/stop

Robert Millan wrote: >>I wouldn't be surprised if other perl-based daemons have this same problem. > > > AFAIK the kernel is in charge to interpret shebang headers and run the > corresponding interpreter, so it wouldn't be strange that Linux and kFreeBSD > differ in some way. > > How does this

amavisd-new start/stop

Hi, The command '/etc/init.d/amavis stop' does not stop amavis. It has been like this forever (well, ever since amavis worked on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD). I found out that start-stop-daemon looks for the process with name 'amavisd-new'. On Debian GNU/Linux that is indeed the process name, but on kfr