Le 2015-02-17 18:14, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain (2015-02-14):
Michael Gilbert wrote:
Please consider unblocking kfreebsd-10. It fixes 2 security issues:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/kfreebsd-10
When I saw this request come in, I meant
#x27;ing kfreebsd-kernel-headers
maintainers (and Peter Salinger who made the change) to have their
input on this issue.
[1]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/glibc-bsd-commits/2011-February/001941.html
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.or
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:35:01 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
I think it is fair to try once... I've given back gnustep-dl2 on
kfreebsd-amd64. If it builds fine there, I'll do the same for
kfreebsd-i386
and close this bug.
It built sucessfully on both kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:22:33 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:10:16PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Package: gnustep-back-common
Version: 0.20.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
It seems that gnustep-back-common fails to install in sid on
kfreebsd-* machines. This has
Package: gnustep-back-common
Version: 0.20.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Hi.
It seems that gnustep-back-common fails to install in sid on
kfreebsd-* machines. This has been noticed while trying to build
gnustep-dl2 [1]. I'm not sure what the problem is, since I don't have
access to any b
5 matches
Mail list logo
