Re: Debian GNU/NetBSD webspace

2002-01-28 Thread Mark Eichin
You do realize that the "export scripts" mentioned in that article were recently repaired and re-enabled, right? There was an announcement of this in the last week or two...

Re: SysVinit?

2001-11-06 Thread Mark Eichin
Note that lukem's init is vastly superior to both; I'm sort of hoping (instead of actually doing it, just now) that someone adapts *that* instead, sees a clever way to do with minimal or no changes to the invocation of update-rc.d, and then migrates that back do debian-everythingelse...

Re: hmm...

2001-07-23 Thread Mark Eichin
> One misunderstanding that I have read, is that many Debian users believe > that the BSD ports/packages systems are week or don't work very well -- The particular case that pkgsrc falls down on is upgrading a compatible library. In debian, if libpng2 gets a fix, a new rev of libpng2 goes in "in

Re: Umm.. This is interesting..

2001-07-03 Thread Mark Eichin
> [02:19] (zedboy) i'm still waiting for Debian/Solaris. it wasn't that hard to build dpkg on solaris 8. fakeroot was "hard" (isaexec() and mixed 32- and 64- mode) but the new changes for linux-sparc64 may have helped, I should poke at it again

Re: BSD camp hostility

2001-07-03 Thread Mark Eichin
> Both camps include > batshit wackos and idiots as well as competent developers. Anyone who doubts this - ask someone who was at the BSD bofs (or the bar afterwards) at the Boston Usenix :)

Re: : packages for base system

2001-06-27 Thread Mark Eichin
egads, of *course* you'd use UFS over ext2. That's probably 20% of the reason to use NetBSD to begin with, a filesystem that does things like flush buffers to disk in the right order... So we need a list of what packages will have netbsd-native alternatives. Note that for application stuff we al