Re: porting userland ppp to kfreebsd

Hi, The Anarcat writes: > +#if defined(__linux__) || defined(__GNU__) || defined(__GLIBC__) Only the last one makes sense: ‘__linux__’ is for the Linux kernel and ‘__GNU__’ is for GNU (aka. GNU/Hurd). Thanks, Ludo’. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Re: Detecting kfreebsd kernel while compiling [hurd]

Hi, Joachim Wiedorn writes: > But I don't now how can I specify a GNU/Hurd (with mach-Kernel) > system (hurd-i386), which is still an unofficial port of Debian. I have > only tried 'defined (__hurd__)' which does not work. > > I think if I say 'defined (__GNU__)' this is always the same an ALL >

Re: Detecting kfreebsd kernel while compiling [hurd]

Hi, Joachim Wiedorn writes: > Joachim Wiedorn wrote: [...] > But now I see it is not so easy to test it on other architectures. Does > some now how gcc give the string for 'hurd-i386' architectures? I have > thought it should be simple: > >__hurd__ > > But it seems not. On GNU systems (i

Re: Detecting kfreebsd kernel while compiling

Hi, Cyril Brulebois writes: > There's __FreeBSD__ for plain FreeBSD, and __FreeBSD_kernel__ for > GNU/kFreeBSD (which doesn't define the former, so that people can > distinguish). And ‘__GLIBC__’, which is what most applications really want to know. Thanks, Ludo’. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: Bug#559344: kldutils: bashism used in /etc/init.d/module-init-tools

Hi, Rogério Brito writes: > On Dec 03 2009, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> modules="$(cat /etc/modules /etc/modules.d/* 2>/dev/null | \ >> sed -e 's/#.*//g' -e '/^[ ]*$/d')" >> ^ ^-> space >> +> tab > > Are character classes (

Re: ZFS on kFreeBSD

Hello, Petr Salinger writes: > Fou our specifics, take a look at our SVN repository > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/glibc-bsd/trunk/, namely > freebsd-libs, freebsd-util. Start with target get-orig-source > in debian/rules. Out of curiosity, is there any plan to get the kFreeBSD port into upstream

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

Luca Favatella writes: > It seems it is not enough. > It has only ifconfig > http://packages.debian.org/sid/kfreebsd-i386/inetutils-tools/filelist Hmm, actually it has more than this, but it seems to lack `route', for instance: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/inetutils.git/tree/ Thanks, Lud

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

Hi, Luca Favatella writes: [...] > on the deb package, there is a different script for GNU/kFreeBSD and > GNU/Linux, but the GNU/kFreeBSD version needs "ifconfig" and > "route". I considered porting and switching to BusyBox udhcpc. (I haven't studied the question in depth, so pardon me if this

Re: tomcat6

Hi, Anton Andreev writes: > Do you think Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is stable enough for a LAMP, Tomcat > server OS? I don't know. I haven't used it long enough to have anything to say about its stability. Thanks, Ludo'. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: tomcat6

Hello, Anton Andreev writes: > Is tomcat available on Debian / kfreeBSD? Apparently yes: http://packages.debian.org/sid/tomcat6 . BTW, the proper name is "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD". Thanks, Ludo'. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: Debian GNU/(k)NetBSD and sparc32 hardware?

Hi, Ulrich Teichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What we've seen here is classic bitrot, IMHO. Of course, the main Linux > development platform is x86 and quite a lot kernel developers only work > on one platform. This has introduced bugs for all other ports (and will > continue to do so), which

Re: Debian GNU/(k)NetBSD and sparc32 hardware?

Hi, Ulrich Teichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's not quite true. Dave Miller is still collecting patches, Mark > Fortescue, Krzysztof Helt and others are producing them. See the respective > posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just that there is no real maintainer > for the port. [...] > Ca

Re: Debian GNU/(k)NetBSD and sparc32 hardware?

Hi, BERTRAND Joël <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe, but NetBSD kernel does not correctly work on sun4m/SMP, > like Linux. Today, no one OS can be used on sun4m/SMP workstations, > and I think that it will be easier to fix linux 2.6 sparc32 kernel > than work on debian/xBSD sparc32 port.