>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >>>>&
>> Thanks, Ishikawa-san. I'll fix this up tonight, if you haven't already.
Good morning, Daniel.
I'm planning a hack `OS core independent entries into Debian common
.cf' on this weekend (just posted on this ML). So, please wait it will
be done :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
header comments in patch #820)
I just wrote same idea into my TODO list
(xfree86/people/ishikaawa/TODO).
I'm planning to work for this hack on this weekend :-)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ian xfree86 build hack */
#define RenderLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
#define XftLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
#define XcursorLibraryDir $(TOP)/../../debian/local/exports
# endif
-
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
perH is dedicated to you. :-)
Thanks, I'll work more hardly for Debian SuperH porting ;-)
>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > But ABI level incompatibility does exist between SH3 binary and SH4
>> > binary, so binary for SH3 can not run on SH4 binary environmet.
&g
4
binary, so binary for SH3 can not run on SH4 binary environmet.
Of cause little endien and big endian incompatibility does exists.
So, 4 separated binary arcitecture tree?
binary-sh3, binary-sh4, binary-sh3eb and binary-sh4eb
Is it true?
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
6 matches
Mail list logo
