Re: lxqt-config: FTBFS on hurd-i386: udev not available

Hi! On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 13:49:45 +0200, Paul Sonnenschein wrote: > Package: lxqt-config > Severity: important > Version: 0.14.1-2 > Tags: patch > User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: hurd > > the package lxqt-config fails to build from source on hurd-i386 because > udev is not availab

Re: Bug#932258: console-setup-freebsd: missing dependency

On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 18:06:00 +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 04:15:51PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > this seems like a problem with console-setup-freebsd being arch:all > > and depending on kFreeBSD-specific packages which will not be > > availa

Re: Bug#932258: console-setup-freebsd: missing dependency

Hi! [ I'm not sure this bug closure is entirely correct? See below. ] On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 13:25:50 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > On 17 Jul 2019, at 10:55, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Héctor Orón Martínez (2019-07-17): > > > Package: console-setup-freebsd > > > Version: 1.191 > > > Severity: grav

[RFC] The PIE unholy mess

Hi! I'd like to get some feedback from porters and package maintainers, given that this affects at least both groups. Some background first. One of the reasons PIE has in the past not been enabled by default in dpkg-buildflags, is because it introduced some slowness on some arches, although this

Re: Bug#845193: dpkg: recent -specs PIE changes break openssl

Hi! On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:52:33 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > clone 845193 -1 > reassign -1 dpkg > retitle -1 dpkg: please do not add -specs= flags only on some architectures > thanks I'm afraid I'll have to wontfix this because it is not really implementable. See belo

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

Hi! On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 08:22:09 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Kurt Roeckx: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0200, ni...@thykier.net wrote: > >> * If we were to enable -fPIE/-pie by default in GCC-6, should that change > >>also apply to this port? [0] > > > > If -fPIE is the default

Re: Bug#826906: uid-wrapper: FTBFS[!linux]: only supports libc.so.[0-9] filename

Hi! On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 02:20:15 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Package: uid-wrapper > Version: 1.2.0+dfsg1-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > I found this happens because src/uid_wrapper.c doesn't detect the libc's > filename. It

Re: Bug#811315: getdns: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: needs getentropy implementation

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/getdnsapi/getdns/pull/182 On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 13:59:00 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Guillem Jover wrote: > > Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > > getdns FTBFS on kfreebsd because it lacks a getentropy implementation > > > f

Bug#816764: zfsutils: Could be switched to use system libmd

Control: tags -1 patch Hi! On Sat, 2016-03-05 at 00:30:23 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Source: zfsutils > Source-Version: 10.1~svn272500-1 > Severity: wishlist > I noticed that this package contains an embedded version of libmd from > FreeBSD. This package could be switched

Bug#820151: kfreebsd-10: non-DFSG mode (for ubuntuBSD)

Hi! On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 23:17:08 +0200, Jon Boden wrote: > Package: kfreebsd-10 > Version: 10.1~svn274115-4+kbsd8u3 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > This patch has no effect on Debian but it enables "non-DFSG mode" when > compiling kfreebsd-10 on ubuntuBSD. Please could you apply it to make

Bug#816764: zfsutils: Could be switched to use system libmd

Source: zfsutils Source-Version: 10.1~svn272500-1 Severity: wishlist Hi! I noticed that this package contains an embedded version of libmd from FreeBSD. This package could be switched to use the now packaged libmd from the system. Thanks, Guillem

Bug#609757: ITP: libmd -- Message Digest functions from BSD systems

Control: reassign -1 wnpp Control: retitle -1 ITP: libmd -- Message Digest functions from BSD systems Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: owner -1 ! Hi! On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 00:02:51 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Few reasons, one has been because libmd is more generic than something >

Re: Bug#811315: getdns: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: needs getentropy implementation

Hi! On Sun, 2016-01-17 at 21:42:03 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Package: getdns > Version: 0.9.0-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > getdns FTBFS on kfreebsd because it lacks a getentropy implementation > for the FreeBSD kernel. But there is one already in LibreSSL Portable > we can use,

Re: Defaulting to i686 for the Debian i386 architecture

On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 19:15:54 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > question to the Hurd and KFreeBSD maintainers ... change that on these > platforms too? As it currently stands, this is not a question when it comes to dpkg, that specific change is all or nothing. The Debian ←→ GNU cpu mapping is globa

Re: kernel on buildd (Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5714 - trunk/glibc-ports/kfreebsd/bits)

Hey Steven! On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 22:22:06 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Guillem Jover wrote: > > In any case here's the patches I've prepared to send upstream. Only > > build tested, though. > > Thanks for this. Thank you for the review and testing. &

Re: kernel on buildd (Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5714 - trunk/glibc-ports/kfreebsd/bits)

buildds, something I'm not sure about. In any case here's the patches I've prepared to send upstream. Only build tested, though. Thanks, Guillem From e8cfe3d17d61e19203445cbf96a136fad30fc05a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:46:02 +0

Bug#787042: util-linux: FTBFS on kFreeBSD due to missing F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC

Source: util-linux Source-Version: 2.26.2-5 Severity: important Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Hi! Here's a patch to fix the FTBFS on kFreeBSD systems. I've gone with the quick fix (partially lifted from Steven proposal for glibc) that will work only with very recent kFreeB

Re: [PATCH] PR target/48904 x86_64-knetbsd-gnu missing defs

Hi! On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 09:58:28 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 30 April 2015 at 07:00, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 04/29/2015 02:01 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > >> > >> 2012-09-21 H.J. Lu > >> > >> PR target/48904 > >> * config.gcc (x86_64-*-knetbsd*-gnu): A

Re: Bug#779467: dpkg: start-stop-daemon sometimes exits with "_cpu_tick_frequency: no such symbol" on kFreeBSD

Hi! On Sat, 2015-02-28 at 18:21:13 -0600, Jeff Epler wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.17.23+local1 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > On a Debian Jessie kFreeBSD system, start-stop-daemon sometimes exits with > an odd error: > > $ sudo service nfsd restart > start-stop-daemon: _cpu_tick_fr

Re: Pre-Depends changed for dpkg on GNU/kFreeBSD

On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 23:59:25 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 04:45:13 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 22:03:37 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > > No problem. Does that mean you'd happily revert to using linprocfs? > &

Re: Pre-Depends changed for dpkg on GNU/kFreeBSD

Hi! On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 04:45:13 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > After checking the s-s-d and libkvm code again now, it seems it does > not require any kvm_read(3) at all, so /dev/mem should not be needed > either, could you try the attached patch on a jail? (I need to recover > my

Re: Pre-Depends changed for dpkg on GNU/kFreeBSD

On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 22:03:37 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 19:34, Guillem Jover wrote: > > In dpkg 1.17.13 I switched start-stop-daemon on GNU/kFreeBSD to use > > the native kFreeBSD backend using libkvm instead of using the Linux > > backend through linprocfs. &

Pre-Depends changed for dpkg on GNU/kFreeBSD

Hi! In dpkg 1.17.13 I switched start-stop-daemon on GNU/kFreeBSD to use the native kFreeBSD backend using libkvm instead of using the Linux backend through linprocfs. Requiring linprocfs has always seemed somewhat wrong to me, more so when on FreeBSD procfs is actually optional. This means the li

Re: Bug#754718: lmms: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: 'ESTRPIPE' was not declared in this scope

Hi! On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 23:11:45 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > --- debian/rules.orig 2014-10-01 20:13:22.0 +0100 > +++ debian/rules2014-10-01 22:55:19.415683658 +0100 > @@ -4,9 +4,15 @@ > > DH_CMAKE_BUILD_DIR=obj -${DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE} > DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH ?= $(shell d

Re: Bug#763693: dnsmasq: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: missing strlcpy

Hi! On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 22:24:29 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Package: dnsmasq > Version: 2.72-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > dnsmasq FTBFS on kfreebsd, because it builds some code to use FreeBSD > PF, which also uses strlcpy

Re: Bug#763572: pbs-drmaa: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: uses non-POSIX mode flag

Hi! On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 03:14:07 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Package: pbs-drmaa > Version: 1.0.17-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > pbs-drmaa/job.c uses S_ISREG, which is not part of core POSIX > specification; instead it shou

Re: Bug#763685: apt-cacher-ng: FTBFS[!linux]: C++11 syntax error, systemd dependency

Hi! On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 22:20:31 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > In addition to fixing the syntax error in include/dlcon.h, the attached > packaging changes seem to allow apt-cacher-ng to still build on > non-Linux, and the sysvinit scripts still work to start and stop it. > diff -Nru apt-ca

Re: getPeerCred on kfreebsd-*

Hi! On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 20:13:37 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > the latest version of haskell-dbus is failing on the BSDs, as it started > to use getPeerCred in haskell-network. That is only available if the > following configure.ac snippet detects it: […] > Would you care to see if this is

Re: kfreebsd-10 FTBFS with libbsd/0.7.0

Hey! On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 21:33:54 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Thanks for explaining this. No problem. :) > On 27/08/14 20:40, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I see you've dealt with this now. Regardless, I think this was the > > correct “fix”, even if usually not k

Re: kfreebsd-10 FTBFS with libbsd/0.7.0

Hi! On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 20:03:46 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 25/08/14 19:07, Christoph Egger wrote: > > Indeed it works! And I'm running that 10.1 kernel just right now! As > > soon as some solution is committed I can upload it to experimental (or > > should I just go ahead and patch -

Re: Clustering.

Hi! On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 22:03:22 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 08/07/14 13:58, Thomas Martin wrote: > > NB: output of cluster-glue's compilation (I delete iproute and > > iputils-ping from build-depends): > > ipcsocket.c: In function 'socket_verify_auth': > > ipcsocket.c:2569:3: error: #

Re: Bug#630911: please provide link_ntoa()

On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 07:30:22 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:21:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 00:27:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > 2011/6/27 Guillem Jover : > > > > The problem with link_ntoa() is that

Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing

Hi! On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 00:49:17 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend > to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: > > For kfreebsd-*, I > - co-maintain arch-related packages under the hat of t

Re: Bug#732937: dpkg: fails somewhat regularly on kfreebsd-amd64

Control: reassign -1 apt Control: found -1 0.9.13~exp1 On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 07:00:00 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 21:53:19 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Michael Gilbert wrote: > > > dpkg seems to often fail on kfreebsd-amd64 on unstable (I had not >

Re: Bug#732937: dpkg: fails somewhat regularly on kfreebsd-amd64

Hi! On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 21:53:19 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Michael Gilbert wrote: > > dpkg seems to often fail on kfreebsd-amd64 on unstable (I had not > > experienced this with wheezy). > > I can confirm that for kfreebsd-i386. Ok, this is something new, I had not seen it before, but I can

Bug#724747: libbsd-dev modifies libelf-dev's /usr/include/nlist.h

Hi! On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 01:20:50 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > severity 724747 serious > thanks > > Because this is a file conflict. I'll leave this bug as serious, but not because of a supposed file conflict, which there is none, but because the restored header is binary incompatible with the on

Bug#729536: libkvm-dev: kvm.h fatal error nlist.h No such file or directory

Control: severity -1 serious [ Because it breaks other packages. ] Hi! On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 01:27:46 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Package: libkvm-dev > Version: 9.2+ds1-6 > Severity: important > > This happens on buildd: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nodejs&arch=kfreebsd-amd64

Cleanups before leaving the team

Hi, I'm planning on removing myself from the glibc-bsd alioth group in around two weeks. If someone is interested in the git-svn mirror, please copy the repo and the clone script somewhere else, as I'll be removing them before removing myself from the group, otherwise I'll not be able to disable

Bug#726970: freebsd-glue: Broken funopen() implementation

Source: freebsd-glue Source-Version: 0.1.11 Severity: important Hi, The funopen() implementation in this package uses nested functions to wrap the argument hooks, but it returns a FILE structure pointing to those nested functions and their references to arguments from the stack, to be accessed ou

Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)

On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 23:25:16 +, Robert Millan wrote: > Guillem Jover: > > I'd have needed it to enable git for the project, and to create a git > > repo for the bi-directional bridge, so that people who want to keep > > using svn can do so, and anyone else tha

Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)

Hi! On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 20:50:19 +, Robert Millan wrote: > Guillem Jover: > > I've now done a git-svn clone so that I can work with something saner, > > and I'd put the repo in the project git space, so that others can use > > it and do not need to do the ini

glibc-bsd svn repository git mirror

Hi! I've pushed a git mirror of the svn repo to alioth, which in theory should get updated on each svn commit, that can be used either to just track the svn repository using read-only git: or to bootstrap a git-svn local repo

Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)

Hi! On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 16:10:44 +, Robert Millan wrote: > Guillem Jover: > > I'll look into updating to latest upstream preserving the current > > support, hopefully in the coming days, been a bit busy lately, sorry! > > That's what you said in July! :-)

Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing

Hi! [ Had forgotten about this one, sorry. ] I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: For kfreebsd-*, I - co-maintain arch-related packages under the hat of the GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers. - maintain a portability

Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)

Hi! On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 20:46:54 +, Robert Millan wrote: > I made a little experiment to simplify ufsutils and make it easier to > update. By merging ufsutils into freebsd-utils package and using its > build environment, with recent freebsd-glue (0.1.4) it is now possible > to build ufsutils

Re: Bug#721886: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: glibtop_machine.h:26:19: fatal error: nlist.h: No such file or directory

Hi! On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 19:52:13 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 05.09.2013 19:42, schrieb Julien Cristau: > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 19:40:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Am 05.09.2013 19:29, schrieb Julien Cristau: > >>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 17:50:18 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >

libedit: Fix build system to use system instead of embeded functions

Package: libedit Version: 3.1-20130712-1~exp1 Severity: normal Tags: patch On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 22:32:13 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 19:34:01 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > I just uploaded in experimental a new upstream version of libedit > > published

Re: New version of libedit in experimental: tests welcome

Hi! On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 19:34:01 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > I just uploaded in experimental a new upstream version of libedit > published here: > http://www.thrysoee.dk/editline/ > > It would be nice if you could test if your packages still behave the > same. I am not really worried but si

Re: Bug#712633: marked as done (Include freebsd-config into freebsd-buildutils)

Hi! On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 10:36:09 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Changes: > freebsd-buildutils (10~svn251967-1) experimental; urgency=low […] >[ Robert Millan ] >* Add freebsd-config back. (Closes: #712633) Hmmm, this has the problem that it introduces a circular build-depe

Re: zfsutils_9.1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Hey! On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 22:21:20 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2013/7/22 Steven Chamberlain : > > On 22/07/13 20:18, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > >> zfsutils (9.1-2) unstable; urgency=low > >> . > >>* Reupload. > > > > Just FYI there is a Lintian check that expects slightly more specific >

Re: FreeBSD 9.2

Hi! On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 07:45:30 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > Ideally whole set [1] of 9.1 based packages should migrate into > testing before upload of a corresponding 9.2 package into sid. > Especially lag of ufsutils (still 8.2) worries me. I was planning on working on ufsutils, and I can d

Re: libgphoto2 and sane-backends FTBFS with libusb2-dev

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 14:16:57 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 07/25/2013 12:55 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: > >I'm preparing the upload right now. > > I'm ready and waiting with an updated libgphoto2 here. Just ping > me once you have uploaded freebsd-libs an

Re: libgphoto2 and sane-backends FTBFS with libusb2-dev

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 12:21:37 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >Petr, if you could commit the patch (so that authorship is preserved), > >I'll do an upload today (otherwise I'll commit myself, although I > >prefer to have proper attributtions on the VCS). > > It just remains to do upload, it is in o

Re: libgphoto2 and sane-backends FTBFS with libusb2-dev

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 07:29:53 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >>Do we have other options except waiting for a new release of libusb2-dev > >>and removing the outdated kfreebsd packages from testing to make > >>libgphoto2 and sane-backends swiftly migrate to testing? > > >Anyways, what keeps us from

Re: freebsd-libs_9.0+ds2-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes is NEW

Hi! On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 21:22:13 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > binary:libelf-freebsd-1 is NEW. At least this one is a really bad idea, because even if it doesn't cause a file system conflict with the other libelf implementations they are a namespace conflict, due to using the exact same SO

Re: [call for upload] kfreebsd-kernel-headers

Hi! On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 22:04:38 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 11/06/13 18:53, Petr Salinger wrote: > > please could some DD upload kfreebsd-kernel-headers from current SVN. > > I also committed a small fix for #686402 as r4516, if it's not too late > to include that too. Sure, I'm on

Re: [RFC] Switching glibc-bsd from svn to git

Hi! On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 09:06:33 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > On Sun, 19 May 2013, Guillem Jover wrote: > >I'd even volunteer to switch the repositories > > Outcome of discussion seems be: > > - use svn or git > switch to git > > - packaging-only

Re: Upstart & kFreeBSD port for Debian

Hi! On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 01:47:42 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > On 22 May 2013 01:16, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Am 22.05.2013 02:00, schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs: > >> On 21 May 2013 21:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >>> On 20/05/13 at 18:19 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > >>> - Neither systemd n

Re: Bug#699208: some more

Hi! On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 23:28:10 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > Just noticed: stopping mpd works fine *unless* it's during the > upgrade. I'll look into it. > > Christoph > > Some more information: > -- > christoph@mitoraj {1} ~ > 23:25 0 % sudo start-stop-daemon --stop --oknodo --retry

[RFC] Switching glibc-bsd from svn to git

Hi! I'd like to propose switching and splitting the glibc-bsd repo from svn to git repositories, because svn is increasingly painful compared to git, when it comes to at least partial commits, tagging (we don't seem to be tagging much), branching and merging, offline hacking, etc... I'd even volu

Bug#700027: kfreebsd-kernel-headers: Redefinition of struct termios

On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 15:14:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 17:17:59 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > I'm filing this to track the issue, and because I have to do some > > other stuff, if no one else has dealt with it by then I'll look into

Re: Debian GNU/kNetBSD Sources

Hi! On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 20:12:44 +0100, Andreas Grapentin wrote: > On 02/23/2013 05:23 AM, Martin wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone here could tell me where to find the sources > > for Debian GNU/kNetBSD? > > > > As i am after the sources for this abandoned project. > > I'd second that. > I'

Re: Bug#700530: qt frames empty

On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 16:16:54 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Linux, the SO_PEERCRED socket option gives that information. On > FreeBSD, there's a getpeereid() libc call. On kFreeBSD, no such thing > exists in glibc as far as I can tell, so the patch uses the > LOCAL_PEERCRED socket option ins

Bug#700027: kfreebsd-kernel-headers: Redefinition of struct termios

Package: kfreebsd-kernel-headers Version: 0.82 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 inetutils Hi! I just uploaded a new inetutils version (with a minimal change) which FTBFS, but it built fine before. Just for reference, here's the build log:

Re: Bug#697032: rcpp: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: #error "Rcpp::Timer not supported by your OS."

On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 17:41:52 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 31/12/12 17:06, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > https://r-forge.r-project.org/scm/viewvc.php/pkg/Rcpp/src/Timer.cpp?root=rcpp&r1=4182&r2=4181&pathrev=4182 > > Actually... presence of rather depends on the libc, not the kernel? > >

Re: libgeom: may cause segfault of grub-probe

much insignificant, so regardless of that: Acked-by: Guillem Jover I'll add missing stuff to libbsd, and for jessie I'll make freebsd-glue play well with the overlay, once that's fixed the other packages can be switched back to use the overlay. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: Bug#685625: implicit declaration of function ‘reallocf’

ebsd-buildutils/debian/patches/20_libbsd_overlay.diff?view=markup There were bugs in the libbsd include logic which made the overlay unusable, this should be fixed now in latest libbsd versions. So it should be possible to switch packages back, although I'm not sure of the effects of mixing

Re: Bogus F_SETFL usage with FD_CLOEXEC

On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 13:05:28 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 22:51:11 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > Using Debian Code Search we can see other cases where possibly the same > > mistake has been made - I wonder if any of these would cause bugs

Bogus F_SETFL usage with FD_CLOEXEC (was Re: Bug#679198: ...)

On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 22:51:11 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Using Debian Code Search we can see other cases where possibly the same > mistake has been made - I wonder if any of these would cause bugs: > > http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=fcntl.*F_SETFL.*FD_ Ah, nice thinking. All these

Re: Re: Bug#675845: adanaxisgpl: FTBFS:

Hi! On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 03:26:49 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Control: found -1 1.2.5.dfsg.1-4.1 > Control: tags -1 + patch > The problem is a '#define off_t long', which causes a problem later when > GNU/kFreeBSD headers include (again), and try to redefine > off_t for some reason. > >

Re: Providing strl/strl.h in libbsd

On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 12:32:04 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, November 23, 2012 01:25:56 AM Guillem Jover wrote: > > I've just checked to see where this strl.h is coming from, and it > > appears to be a compat library of its own, and TBH I don't see the > &

Bug#665997: closed by Guillem Jover (Bug#665997: fixed in libbsd 0.4.0-1)

#665997: libbsd uses wrong compiler when cross-building > > > > It has been closed by Guillem Jover . > [...] > > - Autoconfiscated, supports cross-building natively. (Closes: #665997) > > This is nearly there, but not quite. You're not passing the required > --

Re: Providing strl/strl.h in libbsd

Hi! On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 21:14:05 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I'm one of the maintainers of opendkim. The upstream developer is a > BSD user and opendkim makes use of strlcpy and strlcat and he has, up > to now, provided an embedded copy of these functions for non-BSD > platforms. > > In op

Re: elfutils FTBFS

On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 14:12:18 -0800, Christoph Egger wrote: > Can anyone look at elfutils? it hasn't successfully built on kfreebsd > for 2 years (and was always "fixed" by a binary upload) > > #debian-hurd: > > christoph: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662041#17 and #68

Re: Bug#692992: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*

On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:03:20 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 12.11.2012 03:24, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 21:01:16 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > The imptcp module seems like has never been available in anything > > non-Linux, so I've restricted i

Re: Bug#692992: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*

Control: tags -1 patch Hi! On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 21:01:16 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: src:rsyslog > Version: 7.2.1-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > the current version of rsyslog from experimental (7.2.1) FTBFS on > kfreebsd-*. > It wou

Re: RFC: drop __GLIBC__ on gcc/kbsd

Hi! On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 13:05:02 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > years ago, when Robert Millan improved the support for k*bsd* in gcc, he > added the __GLIBC__ define as part of the ones provided by gcc itself > (see [1][2]). > Unfortunately, __GLIBC__ is one of the defines provided by glibc itse

Re: cuse4bsd

Hi! On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:47:49 -0700, Christoph Egger wrote: > Also would it be a good idea to keept this in kfreebsd-maintainers > team svn or something? Yeah, I think that would be a good idea if you feel like putting it there. You should have commit access now. ;) thanks, guillem -- To

Bug#678136: zfsutils: FTBFS with libbsd-dev >= 0.4.0

On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 21:40:39 +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > tag 678136 + pending > thanks > On 21.06.2012 21:18, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > Actually you're right, it's fine now in up-to-date sid chroot. > > cool, thanks. I'll wait a bit for Robert or someone else to comment on > the patch. Otherw

Re: freebsd-utils_9.0+ds1-6_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 12:33:32 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Was that a mistake, or is there going to be an upload of that too? In > the latter case, an urgency=low upload of freebsd-glue would now need a > freeze unblock. I don't see why, the freeze is supposed to let any package in sid at

Re: Bug#677227: screen: Workaround for #644788 fails to detect a running screen on kfreebsd / process renaming does not work on kfreebsd

On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 14:34:16 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 12/06/12 14:23, Axel Beckert wrote: > > But on kfreebsd this process renaming don't seem to work. This doesn't > > seem to be a screen issue but a general kfreebsd issue as the following > > works as expected on Linux, but not on

Re: Bug#674260: RM: aspectc++ [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64] -- ROM; FTBFS on kfreebsd

On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 08:12:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > The package aspectc++ does not build on kfreebsd since April now. The > reason for this is, as I suspect, a bug or insufficienty in the fnctl() > implementation on kfreebsd. In order to spe

Bug#669604: kbdcontrol can't load any keymap

On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 23:28:29 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > tag 669604 unreproducible moreinfo > thanks > 2012/4/20 Robert Millan : > > El 20 d’abril de 2012 13:34, Anton Zinoviev ha escrit: > >> # kbdcontrol -l any_file.kbd > >> kbdcontrol: setting keymap: Inappropriate ioctl for device > > > >

Bug#668705: libbsd: Tracking upload of prospective 0.4.0 release

Source: libbsd Version: 0.3.0-2 Severity: wishlist Hi! This is just a bug to track the upload of the yet to be released libbsd 0.4.0. I've it almost ready but I wanted to test build Build-Dependencies to check if everything was fine due to some header cleanup included in that release, and there's

Re: Bug#652575: rsyslog: /etc/init.d/rsyslog modifications for GNU/Hurd

Hi! On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 14:11:41 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 27.01.2012 10:18, Guillem Jover wrote: > >> * rsyslog should probably switch to use s-s-d --exec instead (why is > >>it using --name anyway? that option has always been more unreliable). > > &g

Bug#649234: RM: type-handling -- RoM; unmaintained, debian specific, obsoleted by dpkg arch wildcards

retitle 649234 RM: type-handling -- RoM; unmaintained, debian specific, obsoleted by dpkg arch wildcards severity 649234 normal reassign 649234 ftp.debian.org thanks Hi! On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 12:58:36 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Guillem Jover , 2011-11-19, 05:19: > >This is a tra

Re: Bug#657772: collectd: FTBFS(kfreebsd): deprecated libbsd-dev usage and Werror

clone 657772 -1 reassign -1 libkvm-dev retitle -1 libkvm-dev: Should use retitle 657772 libbsd-dev: Should not provide severity 657772 important thanks On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 18:04:42 +, Robert Millan wrote: > reassign 657772 libbsd-dev > found 657772 0.3.0-1 > retitle 657772 libbsd-dev: plea

Re: Bug #550611: please use libbsd instead of glib for strlcpy

Hi! On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 18:45:53 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > As mentioned above, I'm looking forward to the inclusion to base > system of this package, but in the way to achieve this, libbsd0 is not > priority:important, what's your opinion? This is the other way around, once you've proposed to mov

Re: Bug#659280: libpmount: FDTBFS(kfreebsd): missing include?

Hi! On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 20:02:05 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Package: src:libpmount > Version: 0.0.15 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid wheezy > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Justification: fails to build from source (but b

Re: sysvinit: FTBFS on kfreebsd due to missing sys/signalfd.h

Hi! On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 21:42:17 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > Package: sysvinit > Version: 2.88dsf-19 > Severity: normal > > cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat > -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -W -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE > -DACCTON_OFF -c -o last.o last.c >

Re: Bug#655865: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: field 'export' has incomplete type

On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 13:41:12 +, Robert Millan wrote: > El 14 de gener de 2012 19:17, Guillem Jover ha escrit: > > This is a problem with the newer kfreebsd-kernel-headers, reassigning. > > Actually it's not. Upstream considers that users of some headers are > res

Re: Bug#655865: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: field 'export' has incomplete type

reassign 655865 kfreebsd-kernel-headers retitle 655865 kfreebsd-kernel-headers: missing type to define 'export' field in headers breaks program compilation affects 630203 src:libpmount forcemerge 630203 655865 thanks Hi! On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 13:44:17 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Source: libpm

Bug#631639: __unused in libbsd. workaround for #522773 (linux) and #522774 (libc)

On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 04:27:54 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 19:06:48 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > Package: libbsd-dev > > Version: 0.3.0-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > Tags: patch > > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: kf

Bug#631639: __unused in libbsd. workaround for #522773 (linux) and #522774 (libc)

Hi! On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 19:06:48 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: libbsd-dev > Version: 0.3.0-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > > This patch implements a workaround for __unused name collision with Linux and > Glibc. The trick

Bug#653193: Missing patch

On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:56:45 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > +#define __FAVOR_BSD 1 > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#undef __FAVOR_BSD > > Shouldn't this kind of fix be in libbsd-dev? E.g. in overlay netinet/in.h: > > #if __FAVOR_B

Bug#631639: __unused in libbsd. workaround for #522773 (linux) and #522774 (libc)

On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 17:24:00 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > That won’t help. The overlay mode uses pkg-config which no BSD thing > touches. Well, even OpenBSD has its own re-implementation: regards, guillem

Bug#631639: proposed workaround for __unused problem

Hey Robert, On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 19:51:02 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > Please can you comment on my proposed workaround in bug #631639? Sorry for the disappearence regarding libbsd and libmd, I've been tied up with other stuff and never got to finalize the bureaucratic part of the libmd release

Bug#649234: type-handling: Planned removal tracking bug

Source: type-handling Version: 0.2.23 Severity: serious Hi! This is a tracking bug report for the removal of the package, once the blocking bugs have been fixed or we decide we want to remove it regardless (ideally before wheezy is released), this can be reassigned to ftp-master for the removal f

Bug#274747: type-handling: 274747: dpkg-dev dependency removal

Hi! On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 02:47:33 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jakub Wilk , 2011-11-17, 12:18: > > > Ah, thanks for the list Jakub! Is that exhaustive, against all > > > possible Provides generated by type-handling or only a selected > > > few? > > > > I believe it's exhaustive, but I'll double-c

Bug#274747: type-handling: 274747: dpkg-dev dependency removal

Hi! On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 00:58:30 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Robert Millan , 2011-11-16, 18:18: > >>I just added Depends: linux to iotop (arch all, written in > >>python and depends on a Linux kernel) before I realised that > >>type-handling pulls in dpkg-dev. I would really appreciate it if >

  1   2   3   >