Re: getting apt to work

blem even if he got it compiled (probably in the first release of the chroot environment) it is segfaulting. Fabio -- Debian GNU/Linux Unstable Kernel 2.4.15aa1 fabbione on irc.atdot.it #coredump #kchat | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: debiandoc-sgml

more fun! Fabbione -- Debian GNU/Linux Unstable Kernel 2.4.15aa1 fabbione on irc.atdot.it #coredump #kchat | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Further development

Jeremy C. Reed wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Fabbione wrote: And here is the output: debsd:/# ktruss ktrace.out ... "No such file or directory\n" That isn't the right output. Make sure you have made the ktrace.out file first, by using ktrace. (Or make sure you use /a/path/

Re: Further development

9 apt-get close(0x7) = 0 17899 apt-get open("/var/cache/apt/srcpkgcache.bin", 0, 0xbfbfd0e4) = 7 17899 apt-get fcntl(0x7, 0x2, 0x1) = 0 17899 apt-get __fstat13(0x7, 0xbfbfd080) = 0 17899 apt-get __fstat13(0x7, 0xbfbfd074) = 0 17899 apt-get read(0x7, 0x481a, 0x2172) = 8562 17899 apt-get __stat13("/var/lib/dpkg/status", 0xbfbfd054) = 0 17899 apt-get __sysctl(0xbfbfae8c, 0x2, 0xbfbfae84, 0xbfbfae88, 0, 0) = 0 17899 apt-get __msync13(0x481a, 0x2158, 0x4) = 0 17899 apt-get __stat13("/var/lib/dpkg/status", 0xbfbfd014) = 0 17899 apt-get open("/var/lib/dpkg/status", 0, 0xbfbfcb14) = 8 17899 apt-get fcntl(0x8, 0x2, 0x1) = 0 17899 apt-get break(0x80f7000) = 0 17899 apt-get break(0x80ff000) = 0 17899 apt-get read(0x8, 0x80f7000, 0x8000) = 32768 17899 apt-get __stat13("/var/lib/dpkg/status", 0xbfbfca3c) = 0 17899 apt-get __fstat13(0x8, 0xbfbfcb64) = 0 SIGSEGV SIG_DFL 17899 apt-get "apt-get.core" debsd# -- Debian GNU/Linux Unstable Kernel 2.4.15aa1 fabbione on irc.atdot.it #coredump #kchat | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Further development

Matthew Garrett wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:05:26PM +0100, Fabbione wrote:> You need to do ktrace command (ie, ktrace apt-get foo) and then run ktruss on the ktrace.out that's produced. I don't think it's compiled with debugging symbols, so the core file probably isn

Re: Further development

Matthew Garrett wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 06:55:32PM +0100, Fabbione wrote: I was giving a try today to the new build you made. apt-get is segfaulting and I didn't reach to recompile it due to an error in the ftparchive/cachedb.h Do you have any clue??? Hmm. Odd. I ha

Re: Further development

e to an error in the ftparchive/cachedb.h Do you have any clue??? Im running the chroot on a netbsd 1.5.2, does it matter or I need another version Im just curious to try so please don't blame me :) Thanks fabbione -- Debian GNU/Linux Unstable Kernel 2.4.15aa1 fabbione on irc.atdot.it

Re: Developer servers

to workstations :) fabbione Pierfrancesco Caci wrote: > > :-> "Fabbione" == Fabbione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Unfortunatly I will have only one ip address on the real internet that's > > mean that all the developers will have to jump o

Developer servers

Hi all, I'm on the way to receive my adsl (i hope soon) and to place some machine on the internet for this project. I would like to discuss with some of you few points so that they can be really usefull. I've 3 boxes at the moment (one i386, one Amiga 4k and one Sparc 2) first off I would

Re: packages for base system

mostly the latest part of building a distro. Regards Fabio Andreas Krennmair wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Fabbione wrote: > > Hi don't completly agree.. please read my comments below > > > > > dpkg-ftp - Ftp method for dselect > > &

Re: packages for base system

d stuff like that) fabbione

Re: Project Status

HI, that's not the first time I have asked for having a dpkg working on BSD but I was never pointed out to a URL. Now if people have already done soemthing is not the time to start to share??? So maybe people can get involved a little bit more. I am not a C expert but atleast I can start to

Re: [Fwd: Debian/BSD survey....]

[SNIP] > > Well the one that can be ported to many platform as possible. > Seems should have the list for which we can uses/port, for example, > apt-get.. ? Sorry I didn't express correctly my idea at all. Read: Ok we can port to X numbers of platform. Does it make sense to port to all of them fro

[Fwd: Debian/BSD survey....]

Sorry I forgot to CC to the list--- Begin Message --- Michael Goetze wrote: > > Hi... I just read the archives for this list... sure hasn't been much > happening. I'd like to > conduct a quick and dirty survey to see whether it's worthwhile to get > involved with this... I'd > like to ask everyo